GAME PLANS /Attenzione alle Informazioni fornite da Autori sospetti.

Hi -
One of the most perplexing questions for me are the mind control authors, who have done an apparently good job of publicizing the older, MKULTRA style mind control techniques, yet are perpetrators according to MKULTRA victims.  Why, if they are perps, would they go to so much trouble to actually publish information about MK techniques, instead of covering up?
Here is a response from MKULTRA survivor xxx  xxxx
Her lengthy answer may help us to be more discerning as we pick
our way through the mind control informational mine field:

------- Forwarded Message Follows -------
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 19:33:06 -0400
From: xxxx
To: xxxx
Perp Games - PERPS WHO PUBLISH BOOKS AND APPEAR ON
TALK RADIO AND AT SEMINARS:

I've figured out the following patterns, with the input of other victimized survivors who are sick and tired of being revictimized and tricked and used:

#1, by perps making themselves the experts on mind control, people will be dependent on them for information instead of looking for other, more valid sources of information.

#2, by being experts, especially when claiming to be under attack by the bad guys, they make survivors feel sorry for them, make them feel like they're on the same side.  Then the survivors will go to them for help andinformation.  This gives the perps the grand opportunity to reaccess survivors via their previously installed programming and then either mess them up royally or gain their trust and get them to give the perps all theirdocumentation and memories so that the CIA, etal can then go through THEIR records and destroy anything that can connect the survivors in any remaining way to them.  It's also a way to monitor those of us who are breaking programming, to see if further intervention needs to be done to get us back under control or to silence us - sometimes by suggestions of suiciding.
This is what Mark Phillips did to me and to Brice Taylor.

#3, said perps in sheeps' clothing also use some revictimized survivors (I call them trained seals, no offense intended) to promote the perps and thereby get other survivors to trust and come to them. After all, if theoutspoken survivor says the perp is safe and legit, other survivors are a lot more likely to risk divulging personal information to the perps.

#4, said perps also are able to control what information goes out to the public by being "the" experts on mind-control, etc. They not only can make sure what is NOT said by all agreeing not to bring up those particular subjects, but they can also make the survivor community look psychotic, paranoid, etc. by pandering tainted information to militia/Patriot/anti-NWO/White Supremacist groups in books and personal appearances. Walter Bowart, Ted Gunderson, Mark Phillips and several others do this on a regular basis. By making us look looney or paranoid or conspiracy nuts since THOSE extremist groups believe us, noone else will take us seriously. It's perhaps the most effective tool to-date to keep us disbelieved.

#4, Mark Phillips once bragged to me that their disinformation is a deliberate combination of something like 95% truth, with 5% unrecognized lies slipped in. He said this is the most effective form of disinformation.This is why these experts appear to be very, very credible.They are, except for that 5% bullshit that most people won't realize they've swallowed. And how are we to know what is the truth and what is lies, since they are the experts and we don't know any better? This is why I refuse to
read their materials anymore.  It messes me up too much and discredits me when I then parrot what they've said and written.  That is also part of the reason why they do this - to discredit anyone who quotes them.

#5, by making themselves to be the experts, we survivors get lazy and depend on them to speak out for us.  It's unfortunately very easy to do. Depending on them to speak out for us effectively silences us, unless we are being used as their trained seals, in which case we can say whatever want, as long as it's the disinfo THEY channel through us.  This is what has been done to Cisco Wheeler, Cathy O'Brien, Brice Taylor, Arizona W. and others, including me in the past.

#6, by making themselves the experts and then making public claims that mind-control survivors' methodically implanted screen memories (EG: UFO abductions, heads of states being morphed giant lizard alien creatures, Illuminati ruling the world, etc.) are reality, the perps are deliberately
reinforcing unreality programming in the minds of many, many unfortunate survivors who have not remembered enough yet to know that it was all a damnable con game designed to keep them so terrified or hopeless that they'll never believe they can truly be free.  This is, to me, the most despicable thing these perps are doing - IN CONCERT now - to individual mind-control survivors, and to the survivor community at large.  I hope they fry in hell for this.

#7, being an expert on mind-control is a fairly good source of money if they play it right. Conference appearances, book sales, etc.  Mark Phillips told me that Walter Bowart made over a million dollars in the 70's because the CIA bought all of his books. And his revised version was being sold for about $100 a pop, a ludicrous price for a book that frankly is full of disinfo.

#8, I think some of these perps have a personal vested interest in regaining control of former victims, to keep us from remembering what they've done to us in the past.  If they can get to us before we remember them, as MarkPhillips did to me, then they can ensure that regardless of what else we may remember from then on, we will not remember their abuses since they now pose as heroes.  It's too amental/emotional clash that effectively keeps the abuse memories suppressed.   Only by spending time away from their control, can the older memories surface and us recognize who and what they really are.

#9, I've heard several times that some of these men are taking advantag of the mental programming of some survivors they're using as trained seals - particularly those women who have sexual/prostitution programming. At least one, a pedophile has also accessed the children of a survivor. Thank God, that survivor figured it out.

#10, some of these perps are on a huge power trip and can't stand not having tranced-out victims to control. They are such social misfits that to have normal relationships is probably literally an impossibility for them.

#11, some of these recycled perps are absolutely terrified that they will beremembered and be slammed in prison . By promoting themselves as good guys and heroes, and by getting enough of a following, they hope to have enough people vouching for them that prosecution may be impossible. In other words, they are covering their butts at a frantic pace. This is notdissimilar to pedophiles who suddenly have powerful religious conversions and become staunch church supporters when they realize their victims are starting to wake up.

There's probably more reasons why these perps are now posing as good-guy experts on mind control, but this is what I can think of right away. Thanks for asking; it was a good mental exercise for me.  You're welcome to pass my response on to whomever. I'm going to forward this to others, but will delete your name.  What I've shared above, I've experienced to some degreemyself with more than one of these shame-ridden men. I am hoping fervently that this will not happen again, but realize I may never be immune to their charms

Back to top of this document

Question: How do I handle information which has been spoken by, or published in a document or book written by, someone accused of being a perpetrator?

xxx's Answer:

First of all, to take an accusation seriously, the accuser should be someone in a position to know. In the email above, xxx went through some of the worst MKULTRA activity imaginable, so I regard her as someone in a position to know. (Always keep in mind that in the covert mind control "game", no one can ever know anything to 100% certainty.)

Once that is established, anything the accused writes or says I take note of, but always keep the information labelled as "tentative". If I use such information, I label it as tentative and explain why.

I use their information for personal insight, but I do not use it to support publicity or persuasion work. I may use it in discussion with other victims, but again, always labelled as potentially false.

If there is a particularly useful piece of information from an accused perpetrator, I will try to verify it through other sources, and will not use it in publicity or persuasion work. "Persuasion" work by the way can include things like persuading family members, police, or doctors that you are facing a real attack and that you are not delusional. Remember that what Kathleen Sullivan has implied above is that perps who publish love to plant "discreditation time bombs", that is false information sandwiched in between good information, for their use at the worst possible time.

Finally, it's good to train yourself to simply regard information published by accused perps as tentative. Don't go beyond that, and worry gravely about everything anyone says or writes. Do respect the potential risk, but don't respect the risk so much you effectively hide under your bed.