Fake-mysterious offenders against biological targets

---

As a programmatic principle, we avoid naming anyone – if not sometimes within official quotations from others – as cause and even less as “culprit” of what is described as “abuse”. Only TWO names appear, and in evidence, those of two uncontroversially recognised criminals: Joseph Mengele and José Maria Delgado. No one can deny that the latter – now almost forgotten by everyone – can emblematically embody the uncatchable enemy, the human being who, for secret and military aims of mental control, would have wanted that two-way transceiver chips be implanted in the skull of people: on this website we merely quote what he himself writes – translated into Italian, too, in a Borighieri edition, even – and he himself divulges also through a famous video clip in which he appears as a matador against an “implanted” bull. All this is largely presented in sub-chapters of this file – Delgado and brain washing, etc.
(See also – The Shock Doctrine by Naomi Klein – Chapter 1 – The Torture Lab. Ewen Cameron, The CIA and the Maniacal Quest to Erase and Remake the Human Mind, and fragments in F.A.C.T.net: A technical overview of mind control tactics).
In parallel with other files from this and another website we administer, a polemical consideration emerges here – and with an urgent prominence - : both the culture of acquiescence and that of resentment are very widespread, while those of doubt and research are confined to a minority: it is consequently necessary to widen their diffusion, by any means, proposing questions, rather than declaring answers, from which, step by step, to try to put back together pictures closer and closer to verisimilar realities, albeit hugely diverse, and possibly also identify and propose feasible goals for precaution and defence.
A crucial point – present in this, but, given its importance, also in other files – concerns human beings who suffer because they are employed as “target victims”, but labelled and thus treated, instead, as psychiatric delirious patients. “So-called” aural hallucinations, for example, have been shown to be due to the presence – even radiologically proven – of microchips abusively inserted into the body, whose activity as two-way transceivers can be demonstrated with the opportune equipment; while from the outside focalised “sounds” can be transmitted directly with precision and for all sorts of purposes into the hearing areas of the brain of a single individual. And this is a problem of differential diagnosis of the utmost importance, already taken into account, but in a very generic way, in the fifth edition of DSM.

Mr. GLENN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources What I found...is there is no law on the books requiring that informed consent be obtained. More important, I believe there is a need for such a law, as there continue to be cases where this basic right--I do view it as a basic right--is abused. As I started out, I would like to put this on a personal level for everyone of my colleagues. You just think about your own family, your own son, your own daughter, or grandchildren who might be, the next time they go to a doctor, the subject of some medical experiment that they are not even told about. I do not think there can be many things more un-American than that. ~ Senator John Glenn, introducing failed Bill S. 193 to 105th Congress.

A document quoted by Wanttoknowm regarding Drones - aka Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Predator and Reaper

I worked on the US drone program. The public should know what really goes on
Whenever I read comments by politicians defending the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Predator and Reaper program – aka drones – I wish I could ask them a few questions. I'd start with: "How many women and children have you seen incinerated by a Hellfire missile?" Few of these politicians who so brazenly proclaim the benefits of drones have a real clue of what actually goes on. I, on the other hand, have seen these awful sights first hand. What the public needs to understand is that the video provided by a drone is not usually clear enough to detect someone carrying a weapon, even on a crystal-clear day. This makes it incredibly difficult for the best analysts to identify if someone has weapons for sure. One example comes to mind: "The feed is so pixelated, what if it's a shovel, and not a weapon?" I felt this confusion constantly, as did my fellow UAV analysts. We always wonder if ... we destroyed an innocent civilian's life all because of a bad image or angle. I know the feeling you experience when you see someone die. Horrifying barely covers it. When you are exposed to it over and over again it becomes like a small video, embedded in your head, forever on repeat, causing psychological pain and suffering. UAV troops are victim to not only the haunting memories of this work that they carry with them, but also the guilt of always being a little unsure of how accurate their confirmations of weapons or identification of hostile individuals were. The UAVs in the Middle East are used as a weapon, not as protection, and as long as our public remains ignorant to this, this serious threat to the sanctity of human life – at home and abroad – will continue.
Note: For more on war crimes committed by the US and UK in the illegal "global war on terror", see the deeply revealing reports from reliable major media sources available here.

Highlights of Changes from DSM-IV-TR to DSM-5
PTSD: National Center for PTSD
Merriam-Webster: Post traumatic Stress

Using little more than a few perforated sheets of plastic and a staggering amount of number crunching, Duke engineers have demonstrated a three-dimensional acoustic cloak. The new device reroutes sound waves to create the impression that both the cloak and anything beneath it are not there.
The acoustic cloaking device works in all three dimensions, no matter which direction the sound is coming from or where the observer is located, and holds potential for future applications such as sonar avoidance and architectural acoustics.

Tutti i dati presentati in questo sito, nel libro attuale e nelle successive riedizioni sono rigorosamente controllati per evitare ogni rischio di equivoci e di erronee interpretazioni; ogni documento vi viene presentato a comprovare FATTI e - in mancanza di sicuri APPURATI elementi - evita accuratamente di proporne suggestionanti cause o peggio attribuirne responsabilità. E' da riconfermare che la dettagliata elencazione - parzialissima e solo esemplificativa - proposta nel sito e nel libro NON vuol essere una richiesta di esplicite proibizioni: ma ne vuole stigmatizzare e sottolineare la pericolosità intrinseca se impiegate con intenti esplicitamente lesivi da mani esperte e determinate, come pure segnalarne gli effetti dannosi in mani incoscienti e dilettantesche per scopi banali o persino per divertimento se non per stupide curiosità.

Labeled by evident question-marks the title in the parallel file\chapter NUOVISSIME TECNOLOGIE? ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES? TECHNOLOGIES ? AVANCEES ? SPITZEN TECHNOLOGIEN? hints to point out the necessity to examine and confirm mysterious damages through documentations at the same time description and testimonial of technological research and\or crossed investigations; while the title - also with question mark - of the file Opinions or accusation? tries to countercheck and counterbalance serious misunderstandings derived from giving "special" meanings to factual data, naive and presumptuous defective abstractions "interpreting" descriptions of cases and representations of objects as if they were metaphoric indications of symbols. However evidence supplied by objects damaged or turned anomalous is far more reliable and truer than the uneasy rendering of personal experience or exhibits concerning highly complex systems as those of living organisms: it is for this reason that - methodologically - we would prefer as often as possible to study "silent things" rather than "talkative interlocutors", especially "to let things speak for themselves" than told descriptions or worse copy and paste second-hand articles. Notwithstanding the basic target of our work does not aim at preserving objects but at opposing all kinds of ABUSE and VIOLENCE - both words indicating actions contrary to mankind welfare - at least documenting them as stated by the Association Statute. Anyway our focusing on mental, physical and technological abuses directs us "on personal facts and sufferings", while our scientific culture in the social medical field uses to advantage the "fourth dimension" in living beings rendered explicit in MEMORY as arising flash-backs in its slow moving and intermitting turning into consciousness. In sum up parallel to this file\chapter becomes then the renewed file\chapter describing Experiments on children with its impressive real life experiences transcribed first hand and illustrated with photos taken at the time when the events took place. Any way even if "objects as witnesses" are more directly simple than personal talks, and if living beings are much more multifarious than "things" and their occurrences much more doubtful to be depicted and explained, nonetheless we repeat that the basic aim of our Association is to act against mental and whichever bodily Abuses impairing human beings and not to care for objects.On coming back just to this file/chapter, both objects and personal facts are here described and depicted to outline the difficult to understand their "how" and ask for new data: but objects and facts can fit as witness only if not dogmatically assumed. And so here on can find on this file - which also will be timely up-dated - new documented data regarding other facts and their connections, summarized and visually depicted.
But here a dreadful question has to be put forward: how many and of which form "strange harms" can hurt secretively objects but also wound persons disguised as causing banal domestic accidents"? And the more: what occurs if  similar "forces" assault a person's body, inside not only outside? What to do when apparent "normal" falls caused by sudden heart-infarcts or brain-strokes look so apparently "normal" not even claiming for autopsy? In fact: by which means one can get recognizable what happens if an "immaterial blow" bangs twisting into a person's body as it acted on the damaged tea-cup? What will be the consequences if CUTTTING internal organs, or blood vessels with a probable biggest hemorrhage? Not only it will become MORTAL but also a so giant blood flooding could hide - as it really sometimes happened - its causing proofs.Thus an implicit challenge: what is the characteristic of the "energy" displayed to reach those precise abnormal cuttings on things and hits on people's bodies causing deceitful dangers? And then how can our pathologists or coroners understand what happened? How they can watch accidents causing so "strange" harms?
How they can even realize that were injuries from external and not consequences of a "normal" illness?What is to be known is even that such actions can be performed with engines produced as very real and even commercial tools, which can be bought even by everyone, even with banal "order forms" in Internet. Then these powerful and deceitful "energies" are surely NOT something as ghosts' tricks, or science fiction as Star Wars Engines: they are realities which could be managed by everyone, also or mostly by not ever ethical persons. In fact especially this problem needs sure answers since these "energies" as beams are really used as aggressive rays: therefore which could be the technical engines to realize such a "weapon"? A crucial question since only a sure knowledge of causes can permit a well-grounded protection. Any way since some testimonies are not so much reliable, moreover when telling with novel like words - as for example "levitation" - notwithstanding something alike could really happen: and so a body launched out of window could make believe a suicidal act, a way not only to hit but also to discredit the target. How join a better knowledge to effectively protect?
All sites and publications, persons and Institutions are endorsed coming from direct advices as well as from alert surveys. But this is a tangled field to be continually revised: each suggestion must be thanked even if also faced WITH RESERVATION. Of course it is a very disproportionate match, disproportionate but not surely defeating: one can fight well even only on letting these facts, these matters, these situations the MOST KNOWN worldwide. This page is made to document but moreover to ask: to open the possibility of a serious and profitable exchange of sure, documented, scientifically probed knowledge. Notwithstanding it does NOT proposed to accuse: so it stops to describe every not enough precise and specified data, avoiding every inference regarding not well supported occurrences. Everyone
 does have to AVOID bare words or pitiful moaning: one can fight on an acceptable level only on pointing out and suggesting the way the most precise, seriously studied, accurately defined.

Correlations and analogies

At first it hints to point out and underline that in the described occasions - whether against material objects, or against electronic structures, or damaging hard-disk files or telematic sites, besides against living beings - the documented dates link to concomitances of possible causes and/or parallel effects; on the contrary it is to stigmatize that the lack of these syncronisations transforms to trash every possible description of facts - in spite of being potentially meaningful since very anoumalos.The "cup damage" happened - accompamied by some other mishaps not alike apt to be defined - on a particular day, May 22 2002 when the search for a surgeon to remove inserted microchip was on trial to be carried out. And thus, if  ''cup'' and the concomitants and not documented accident have been linked in the time to removal of micro-chips, the notarial establishment of the Association synchronised itself by two personal attacks: the first one on October 31 2002, followed by a similar-one on November 5. Paradoxically, at morning in a house of civilian residence, in a neutral place as the bathroom a silent and invisible force, strange and deceitful coming from the lefth and turning in the anti-clock direction towards the right - as in sum up depicted on the spiral's drawing of the little cup's cut - was felt similar a sea wave - when it goes back and forward dragging-pulling - or as a ''lazo'' catching the body in a kind of fight, trying to wrap and, following an horizontal direction, trying to toss the person down towards corners; a wave which lasted lots of seconds in the first case, minutes in the second one, but anyway overcome by the assaulted person. In both cases the attacks performed without change till beginning to ending: whithout any consequence but also - unfortunately - whithout leaving  documentble effects or at least perceived traces - for instance : sounds, smell (like ozone), light. . . and not even signs of bruises or burns. The above described personal facts didn't leave any personal damage as well another successive one happened not at home since on a street, also this time unsuccesfully in spite of its power and insidiousness. This afterwards attack, this new "wave" tried to hit, acting the same horizontally but instead in a "linear way": very strong, at same time at first unperceived, triedOn the contrary, other  cases regarding differents people had not similar favorable outcomes: an unknow force constrained a victime to weaken as she only collapsed, but strangely causing the complete fracture of her left zygomatic-bone. In another time and situation, at the time when a serie of events were very important for the Association's activity, on January 23 2008 a ''very evil attack'', very severe for its prolongation and sorrowful consequences, put, in a violent way, another victim down on the pavement - he described to have had the sensation to be on roller-skate - causing him some lesions, the lighter ones (!) nose fractured and some teeth uprooted.
On the following sub-chapter #enigmatic_accident it is possible to watch at precise documents: photos and anamnestic descriptions genuinely supplied by protagonists and direct testimonies. Also  other damages rising from unaspected action of very precise "energy beams" on commonplace people have illustrated documentation: look at just here below #finger_and_battery