January 11 2006 

IS THAT FEASIBLE TO MANIPULATE HUMAN BRAIN AT DISTANCE?

Information

After the book published, many files have been up-dated and even a new one has been added: to read in the English transalation the new - compelling - addendum, go to the new file Opinioni o peggio:accuse?/Opinions or accusations?. A very compelling advice regarding the whole management of this work can be read on Links e citazioni su segnali di pericolo. The Petitions: #amnesty, #redcross-redcrescent, #China had recently endorsed into this file.
The complete site is ready also as an Encyclopedic book - even if already at present lacking of the newest up-dates.
It's Abuse NOT Science Fiction?
To read a book - a real book on paper, sewn and bound - is easier than reading long files on-line: the Italian scientific and juridical  Association against mental, bodily and technological abuses  PRINTED this site - with all amount of its informations, quotations, illustrations mostly in English, and with its explanations mostly in Italian only seldom provided with English synopsis  - as a NORMAL BOOK. The book is ready to be ACQUIRED at the Printing House Cortina. To order copies the way more directly is to refer at the following addresses:
Libreria Editrice Cortina Torino

Corso Marconi 34/a 10125 Torino (ITALY)
Phone: 0039 0116507074 / 00390116508665 Fax: 00390116502900

 
 

powerful, more puzzling adaptation of the Goya's Slumber of reason, by Andrzej Suda


This powerful, more puzzling adaptation of the Goya's Slumber of reason,  here is used as book cover's image ,  so is explained by the Designer: Andrzej Suda:

should look just like many of the events described by the victims: they  exist, are bothersome, and we don’t know exactly WHY they  are there but they are there… [come molti dei fatti descritti dalle vittime:  essi esistono , turbano e noi non riusciamo a conoscere esattamente  il  PERCHE'  ci siano,  ma ci sono....]


Internal index:  

#information, #space based weapons, #references, #new_article, #amnesty, #redcross-redcrescent, #Russian_space, #China, #international, #statistics

IS THAT FEASIBLE TO MANIPULATE HUMAN BRAIN AT DISTANCE? Electromagnetic & informational weapons: the remote manipulation of the human brain

by Mojmir Babacek

Already published as article in the Australian New Dawn Magazine. 
Its Copyright belongs to the Author: Mojmir Babacek

Ban of space based weapons

Since 1980 of the past century publications are appearing in the world media describing the feasibility of remote control of the activity of human brain. Certainly the publications on mind control technology in the world mass media are governed by the national security information laws and by the wishes of power elites. While western media mostly talk either about Russian mind control technology or only about  western research in this field, the Russian media publications are much more factual. Apparently there are two reasons for this Russian approach. First there was an attempt, in 1991, to use mind control technology during the putsch against Gorbachev and second the Russian Federation seems to be determined to work toward the international ban of the use of this technology. For example in 1994 the Russian weekly Argumenty i Fakty, published an article describing the shooting of a TV series on psychotronic weapons entitled Black Box (according to the article the shooting was soon put to a stop). The weekly describes how the journalist, who volunteered for the experiment, sat down in front of a psychotronic generator and started describing his experiences: 
I can not see clearly any more. I can not concentrate…something is stifling my brain…". In the next part of the TV shooting the journalist was supposed to be subjected to "coding".
This meant that into his brain an activity should be programmed which he would perform when he hears an unusual word connection like "blue camomile". As an example of what he could do the weekly wrote that he could jump out of the window. However the result of this experiment was not published. In contrast to Russian publications the western media do not publish even the information on the development of mind  control technology which can be found in the open military documents (in the USA) or documents of European Parliament (in Europe). However even in the USA dissident politicians present initiatives aiming  at the ban of mind control technologies.
In October 2000, the congressman Denis J. Kucinich introduced in the American Congress a bill, obliging the American president to get engaged in the negotiations aimed at the ban of space based weapons. In this bill the definition of a weapon system includes: 
any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means inflicting death or injury on, or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person)… through the use of land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations.(12) 
As in all legislative acts quoted in this article the bill counts with sound, light or electromagnetic stimulation of human brain. Psychotronic weapons remain, at least for a layman uninformed of secret military research, in the sphere of science fiction, since so far none of the published scientific experiments with new psychotronic technologies was presented in the way which would allow for its replication.
That it is feasible to manipulate human behavior with the use of subliminal, either sound or visual, messages is now generally known. This is why in most of the countries the use of such technologies, without consent of the user, is baned. The facts presented in this article suggest that with the development of technology and knowledge of the functioning of human brain new ways of manipulation of human mind keep emerging. One of them is apparently the electromagnetic energy (among published physical concepts soliton waves and non local electron connection lend themselves,  as well,  for this purpose).
Though in the open scientific literature only some 30 experiments were published, supporting this assumption already in 1974, in the USSR, after succesfull testing with military unit in Novosibirsk, the installation Radioson (Radiosleep) was registered with the Government Committee on the Matters of Inventions and Discoveries of the USSR, described as a method of induction of sleep by means of radio waves. In the report by World Health Association on nonionizing radiation from 1991 we read 
Many of biological effects observed in animals exposed to ELF fields appear to be associated, either directly or indirectly, with the nervous system…. 
Among the published experiments there are experiments where pulsed microwaves caused the synchronization of isolated neurons with the frequency of pulsing of microwaves - for example a neuron firing at a frequency 0.8 Hz was forced in this way to fire the impulses at a frequency of 1 Hz. As well pulsed microwaves changed the concentration of neurotransmitters in brain (neurotransmitters are a part of the mechanism which causes the firing of neurons in the brain) and reinforced or attenuated the effects of drugs delivered into the brain. The experiment where the main brain frequencies registered by EEG were synchronized with the frequency of microwave pulsing might explain the function of the Russian installation Radioson. Microwaves pulsed in the sleep frequency would cause the synchronization of the brain activity with the sleep frequency and in this way produce the sleep. A report derived from the testing program of the Microwave Research Department at the Walter Reed Army Institute of research states 
Microwave pulses appear to couple to the central nervous system and produce stimulation similar to electric stimulation unrelated to heat.
In a many times replicated experiment microwaves pulsed in an exact frequency caused the efflux of calcium ions from the nerve cells (1,2). Pulsing of microwaves in frequency predominating in the brain at awaked state could, by the same procedure, deny the sleep to a human being. In a many times replicated experiment microwaves pulsed in an exact frequency caused the efflux of calcium ions from the nerve cells. Calcium plays a key role in the firing of neurons and Ross Adey, member of the first scientific team which published this experiment, publically expressed his conviction that this effect of electromagnetic radiation would interfere with concentration on complex tasks (7). Robert Becker, who had share in the discovery of the effect of pulsed fields at the healing of broken bones, published the excerpts from the report from Walter Reed Army Institute testing program. In the first part prompt debilitation effects should have been tested (8). Were not those effects based on the experiment by Ross Adey and others with calcium efflux? British scientist John Evans, working in the same field, wrote that both Ross Adey and Robert Becker lost their positions and research grants and called them free-thinking exiles (6). In 1975, in the USA, a military experiment was published where pulsed microwaves produced, in the brain of a human subject, an audio perception of numbers from 1 to 10 (9). Again the possibility to convince human being that it is mentally ill is obvious. The testing program of American Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, where the experiment took place, counts with prompt auditory stimulation by means of auditory effects and finally aims at behavior controled by stimulation (8).
Let us imagine that the words delivered into the brain were transcribed into ultrasound frequencies. Would not then the subject perceive those words as his own thoughts? And could not then his behavior be controled in this way? ,\
The American Air Force 1982 Final Report On Biotechnology Research Requirements For Aeronautical Systems Through the Year 2000 states: 
…subsequent work should address the possibilities of directing and interrogating mental functioning, using externally applied fields….
Several scientists warned that latest advances in neurophysiology could be used for the manipulation of human brain. On June 6, 1992 the Russian daily Komsomolskaya Pravda published part of a call of several heads of Russian research institutes, universities and medical institutions where they wrote: 
20 years ago, when we started working on microwave therapy, we made an agreement that the discoveries in this area we will never use to the detriment of people. The warning of general Kobets, that OMON (Russian antiterrorist police) has got psychotronic weapon goes to prove that the psychotronic weapon has been already produced. If it finds a way into the hands of people with bad intentions, it may be more dangerous than nuclear bomb, since it is capable to stifle the free will of a human being. We address president Yeltsine and democratic organisations of the world with a demand that the use of psychotronic generators in quality of weapons is banned.
In June 1995, Michael Persinger, who worked on the American Navy's project of Non-lethal electromagnetic weapons, published, in a scientific magazine, an article where he states: 
the technical capability to influence directly the major portion of the approximately six billion brains of the human species without mediation through classical sensory modalities by generating neural information within a physical medium within which all members of the species are immersed… is now marginally feasible.
In 1998, the French National Bioethics Committee warned that  neuroscience is being increasingly recognized as posing potential threat to human rights. In May 1999 the neuroscientists conference, sponsored by the UN, took place in Tokyo. In the declaration we read: 
Today we have intellectual, physical and financial resources to master the power of the brain itself, and to develop devices to touch the mind and even control or erase consciousness…We wish to profess our hope that such pursuit of knowledge serves peace and welfare.
In 1999 the STOA (Scientific and Technological Options Assessment), part of the Directorate General for Research of the European Parliament published the report on Crowd Control Technologies, ordered by them with the OMEGA foundation in British Manchester (23). One of four major subjects of the study are the 2nd generation or "non lethal" technologies: 
This report evaluates the second generation of 'non-lethal' weapons which are emerging from national military and nuclear weapons laboratories in the United States as part of the Clinton Administration's 'non-lethal' warfare doctrine now adopted in turn by NATO. These devices include weapons using* directed energy beam,*radio frequency, laser and accoustic mechanisms to incapacitate human targets" (24) The report states that *the most controversial *non-lethal- crowd control* technology proposed by the U.S., are so called Radio Frequency or Directed Energy Weapons that can allegedly manipulate human behavior* the greatest concern is with systems which can directly interact with the human nervous system(25). 
The report also states that perhaps the most powerful developments remain shrouded in secrecy (26).
The unavailability of official documents confirming the existence of this technology may be the reason why the OMEGA report is referencing, with respect to mind control technology, the internet publication of the author of this article (27). In an identical approach the internet publication of the directrice of the American human rights and anti mind control organization (CAHRA), Cheryl Welsh, is referenced by joint initiative of Quaker United Nations Office, United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, and Programme for Strategic and International Security Studies, with respect to non-lethal weapons (28).
On September 25th, 2000 the Committee on Security of the Russian State Duma discussed the addendum to the article 6 of the Federal law On Weapons. In the resolution we read: 
"The achievements of contemporary science* allow for creation of measured methods of secret, remote influencing on the psyches and physiology of a person or a group of people„ (29). The committee recommended that the addendum be approved.
On July 26 the addendum to the article 6 of the Russian Federation law "On Weapons" was approved. It states: 
"*within the territory of the Russian Federation is prohibited the circulation of weapons and other objects the effects of the operation of which are based on the use of electromagnetic, light, thermal, infra-sonic or ultra-sonic radiations* (30). 
In this way the Russian government made a first step to stand up to its dedication to the ban of mind control technology.  In the Doctrine of Informational Security of the Russian Federation, signed by president Putin in September 2000, among the dangers threatening the informational security of Russian Federation, is listed
the threat to the constitutional rights and freedoms of people and citizens in the sphere of spiritual life and illegal use of special means affecting individual, group and societal consciousness"(31).
Among the major directions of the international cooperation toward the guaranteeing of the informational security is listed the ban of production, dissemination and use of "informational weapons" (32). This should be interpreted as the continuing Russian dedication to the international ban of the means of remote influencing of the activity of human brain.
In the above mentioned report, published by the STOA, the originally proposed version of the resolution of the European Parliament is quoted, calling for 
an international convention for a global ban on all research and development* which seeks to apply knowledge of the chemical, electrical, sound vibration or other functioning of the human brain to the development of weapons which might enable the manipulation of human beings, including a ban of any actual or possible deployment of such systems.(33) 
Here the term "actual" might easily mean that such weapons are already deployed.
Among the countries with the most advanced military technologies those are the USA which did not present any international initiative demanding the ban of technologies enabling the remote control of human mind. (The original version of the bill by Denis J.Kucinich was changed.) All the same, according to the study published by STOA, the USA are the major promoter of the use of those arms. Non lethal technology was included into NATO military doctrine due to their effort:
At the initiative of the USA, within the framework of NATO, a special group was formed, for the perspective use of devices of non-lethal effects 
states the record from the session of the Committe on Security of the Russian State Duma (29). The report published by STOA states: 
In October 1999 NATO announced a new policy on non-lethal weapons and their place in allied arsenals (34). In 1996 non-lethal tools identified by the U.S. Army included *directed energy systems*" and "radio frequency weapons (35) 
- those weapons, as was suggested in the STOA report as well, are being associated with the effects on human nervous system. According to the Russian government informational agency FAPSI, in the last 15 years, the U.S. expenses on the development and acquisition of the means of informational war grew four times and at present time they occupy the first place among all military programs (17), (3).Though there are other concepts of informational war than mind control, the unwillingnes of the USA to engage in the negotiations aimed at the ban of the manipulation of human brains might indicate their intent to use those means in internal as well as international affairs. One clear consequence of the continuation of the apparent politics of secrecy surrounding technologies enabling remote control of human brains might be that the governments, who would own such technologies, could use them without having to take into consideration the opinion of the general public. The concept of the democratic world would be, though secretly, disrupted in this way, and in the future the world populations could live in only fake democracy where their own or foreign governments might, by means of secret technologies, shape their opinions.
In the State Michigan in the USA, since January 2004, any person producing, delivering, possessing, transporting or using harmfull  electronic or electromagnetic device may be sentenced for up to 15 years in prison. Since the same punishment is defined in the law for biological, chemical or radioactive weapons it is a serious question whether the U.S. government does not own electronic and electromagnetic weapons of mass destruction. 
In the Doctrine of Informational Security of the Russian Federation, signed by president Putin in September 2000, among the dangers threatening the informational security of Russian Federation, is listed
the threat to the constitutional rights and freedoms of people and citizens in the sphere of spiritual life… individual, group and societal consciousness" and "illegal use of special means affecting individual, group and societal consciousness". Among the major directions of the international cooperation toward the guaranteeing of the informational security is listed "the ban of production, dissemination and use of 'informational weapon‘  .
This should be interpreted as the continuing Russian dedication to the international ban of the means of remote influencing of the activity of human brain.
In the above mentioned report, published by the STOA, the originally proposed version of  the resolution of the European Parliament is quoted, calling for 
an  international convention for a global ban on all research and development… which seeks to apply knowledge of the chemical, electrical, sound vibration or other functioning of the human brain to the development of weapons which might enable the manipulation of human beings, including a ban of any actual or possible deployment of such systems. 
Here the term "actual" might easily mean that such weapons are already deployed. 
Among the countries with the most advanced military technologies those are the USA which did not present any international initiative demanding the ban of technologies enabling the remote control of human mind (the bill by Denis J. Kucinich was first changed and then it was not passed anyway). All the same, according to the study published  by STOA, the USA are the major promoter  of the use of those arms. It states: 
In October 1999 NATO announced a new policy on non-lethal weapons and their place in allied arsenals.
This might have meant that the USA succeeded to put an end to the European effort to ban mind control weapons since: 
In 1996 non-lethal tools identified by the U.S. Army included… "directed energy systems "- and - "radio frequency weapons"
- those weapons, as was suggested in the STOA report as well, are being associated with the effects on human nervous system. According to the Russian government informational agency FAPSI, in the last 15 years, the U.S. expenses on the development and acquisition of the means of informational war grew four times and at present time they occupy the first place among all military programs. Though there are other concepts of informational war than mind control,  the unwillingnes of the USA to engage in the negotiations aimed at the ban of the manipulation of human brains  indicates their intent to use those means in internal as well as international affairs. In 1994 the Strategic Studies Institute at the U.S. Army War College has published  a book  Revolution in Military Affairs and Conflict Short of War. Since the national security information is apparently in question, the book does not tell the readers what technology exactly is making this revolution feasible. From the beginning the authors are aware that the use of this technology may run counter to basic moral and political values of the American society and in consequence the revolution in military affairs would require a moral and political revolution to come first. Since it is difficult for them to imagine that the American Society would accept the ethical and political revolution that would deprive the citizen of his privacy, they develop a scenario of events which would lead the American political leaders to back this revolution. Unfortunately the serious doubts which is raising the activity of American Intelligence Community , and especially CIA and FBI, before the 9/11 attacks raise question whether the 9/11 attacks were not just something that fit some broader project of the American politics for the 21st century. In this case the 9/11 attacks could be used as a part of this scenario which needed some justification for the assault on the privacy of U.S. citizens and sovereignty of foreign nations.
The scenario is placed into the year 2000 and is based on the situation of growing terrorism, drug trafficking and criminality: 
The president was thus amenable to the use of the sort of psychotechnology which formed the core of the RMA (revolution in military affairs) in conflict short of war… In the pre-RMA days, psychological operations and psychological warfare were primitive. As they advanced into the electronic and bioelectronic era, it was necessary to rethink our ethical prohibitions on manipulating the minds of enemies (and potential enemies) both international and domestic... Through persistent efforts and very sophisticated domestic ”consciousness raising”, old-fashioned notions of personal privacy and national sovereignty changed… Potential or possible supporters of the insurgency around the world were identified using the comprehensive Interagency Integrated Database. These were categorized as ”potential” or ”active”, with sophisticated personality simulations used to develop, tailor and focus psychological campaigns for each. 
If the right to privacy of American citizens has been cut down and sovereignty of Iraq destroyed, is there any reason to fear that even the continuation of this scenario will be implemented in the years or decades to come?  In the first place the trickle of the information on mind control technology in the western mass media has been reduced substantially after the 9/11 attacks. In the second place there are indications that those means are being actually used. In December 17-23, 2001 issue of the U.S. army weekly Defense News was published an article Israel Fields Means To Suppress Palestinian Violence where Ben-Israel, outgoing chief of military research and development for the Israeli Ministry of Defense 
said his directorate explored different scientific and phenomenological fields - including mind control - in an attempt to contain and deter terrorist activity.
Though he said that they were using mind control methods, many of which were developed by military and security agencies of the former Soviet Union it is rather realistic to believe that he said so in order to not disclose the existence of the American mind control technology, which they probably used. On June 6, 1992 the Russian daily Komsomolskaya Pravda published the results of the measurement of densities of radiofrequency radiation in 10 appartments in Moscow, where the families complained that their psychic activity and physical shape are being manipulated by electromagnetic radiation. In all ten appartments intensive, directed electromagnetic radiation was found.When in 1991 Komsomoskaya Pravda published the story of a former lieutenant colonel of the Soviet KGB, who complained of the same problems, the newspaper received more than 400 letters from people with similar experiences. Since out of ten above mentioned families only one wrote a letter to Komsomolskaya Pravda there is a strong possibility that there are perhaps ten times more such people in Russia. On July 11,1991, the Russian newspaper Express-Megalopolis wrote that Russian deputy Juri Vlasov had received 2000 such complaints.
Cheryl Welsh, the directrice of an American organisation Mind Justice, engaged in the defence of people complaining of manipulation of their nervous system by technical means, claims that she has received more than 2000 letters describing such experiences and asking for help. Third in place as for the number of  complaints is Japan with 134 such people and in Netherlands, Australia, Canada, Great Brittain, Germany and France the number of complaining people varies between 10 and 50. In the rest of the world the numbers are negligible. However on three English speaking Intertnet lists dedicated to mind control the number of Americans claiming that they fell victims to mind control experimentation  has risen by 104 since June 2004  till the end of that year and this should be perceived as a threat by the world general public. 
In 2003 the Russian weekly Argumenty i Fakty wrote: 
Without any doubt there exist technologies of physical and psychical oppression of human being… but there is no chance to receive information on this subject from the first hand since it is most highly classified.
According to the article in Komsomolskaya Pravda from June 6, 1992  the subject of  effects of microwave radiation on human behavioral functions (creation of biorobots) was placed on the List of Information Banned from Publication in the year 1990 in Russia. It is clear that for as long as those weapons remain classified they can be used without obligation to take into consideration the fact that their use is in conflict with the constitutions of democratic states and for as long as the world mass media do not publish the existence of mind control technology the governments do not need to ask their citizens for a permission to use it. In this way a system of parallel democracy might be created where to some people the rights are denied which are guaranteed to others and for some time the scenario fo U.S. Army Strategic Studies Institute could be implememted in this way. The concept of the democratic world thus remains corrupted for as long as the ban proposed by the European parliament and Russia is not negotiated and enacted in national legislations around the world in a verifiable manner. But this would, in the first place, require teh willingness of the U.S. power elites to participate in this effort. This apparently can not be expected before there is achieved transparency of the American political scene, where national security information law prevails more and more against democracy and is used even against unofficial investigations of the events preceding the 9/11 attacks. For as long as the USA do not intend to participate in the international ban of the remote manipulation of human brains, other countries, like Russian Federation, are obliged to continue in the arms race with respect to mind control technology and maintain the policy of its classification
 

Mojmir Babacek 

(the author is the founder of the:
International Movement for the Ban of the Manipulation of Human Nervous System by Technical Means) 

REFERENCES

1) Handbook of Biological Effects of Electromadnetic Fields, 1996, CRC Press Inc., 0-8493-0641-8/96, - pg. 117, 119, 474- 485, 542-551, 565 at the top and third and last paragraph.
2) World Health Organization report on non-ionizing radiation from 1991, pg. 143 and 207-208
3) V. Lopatin, V Cygankov: Psichotronnoje oruiie i bezopasnost Rossii, SINTEG, Russian Federation, Moscow, ISBN 5-89638-006-2-A5-2000-30, list of the publications of the publishing house you will find at the address http://www.sinteg.ru/
4) G. Gurtovoj, I. Vinokurov: Psychotronnaja vojna, ot mytov k realijam, Russsian Federation, Moscow, Mysteries, 1993, ISBN 5-86422-098-1 
5) With greatest likelihood as well the Russian daily TRUD, which has organized the search for the documents, Moscow, between August 1991 and end of 1992 
6) John Evans: Mind, Body and Electromagnetism, the Burlington Press, Cambridge, 1992, ISBN 1874498008, str.139
7) Robert Becker: Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life, William Morrow and comp., New York, 1985, pg. 287 
8) Robert Becker: Cross Currents, the Startling Effects of Electromagnetic Radiation on your Health, 1991, Bloomsburry Publishing, London, Great Brittain, ISBN 0-7475-0761-9, pg. 304, Robert Becker refers to Bioelectromagnetics Society Newsletter, January and February 1989
9) Don R. Justesen, 1975, Microwaves and Behavior, American Psychologist, March 1975, pg. 391 - 401
10) Dr. Nick Begich and Jeane Maning: Angels Don't Play This HAARP, Advances in Tesla Technology, Earthpulse Press, 1995, ISBN 0-9648812--0-9, pg. 169 
11) http://www.dcn.davis.ca.us/~welsh/byrdexp.htm see at the bottom of the page the Bio of Principal Investigator.
12) M. A. Persinger:  On the Possibility of Directly Lacessing Every Human Brain byElectromagnetic Induction of Fundamental Algorythms, Perception and Motor Skills, June1995,, sv. 80, str. 791-799
13) Nature, vol.391, 22.1.1998,str.316, Advances in Neurosciences May Threaten Human Rights.
14) Internet reference at the site of the United Nations University and Institute of Advanced Studies in Tokyo does not work any more, to verify the information it is necessary to find the document from the 1999 UN sponsored conference of neuroscientists in Tokyo, you may inquire at the address 15) http://www.europarl.eu.int/home/default_en.htm?redirected=1click at Plenary sessions, scroll down to Reports by A4 number ˆclick, choose 1999 and fill in 005 to A4
16) http://thomas.loc.gov/ and search for Space Preservation Act then click at H.R.2977
17) Russian daily Segodnya, 11. February, 2000, Andrei Soldatov: Vsadniki psychotronitscheskovo apokalypsa (Riders of Psychotronic Apokalypse) 
18) See ref. 3), pg. 107
19) See ref. 3) pg. 97
20) See ref. 3), pg. 107
21) See ref. 3), pg. 108
22) See ref. 3) pg. 13
23) http://www.europarl.eu.int/stoa/default_en.htm (choose publications and Crowd Control Technologies)
24) see ref. 23 pg. XIX or 25
25) see ref. 23 pg. LIII or 69
26) see ref.23 pg.XLVII or 63, as well pg.VII-VIII or7-8,pg.XIX or 25, pg.XLV or 61
27) see ref. 19) pg. LIII or 69, note 354 
28) http://www.unidir.org/ : CAHRA and Cheryl Welsh are listed at the page 24
29) Document sent by Moscow Committee of Ecology of Dwellings. Telephone: Russian Federation, Zelenograd, 531-6411, Emilia Tschirkova, directrice.
30) Search www.rambler.ru , there "poisk" (search) and search for gosudarstvennaja duma (State Duma) (it is necessary to type in Russian alphabet), at the page which appears choose informacionnyj kanal gosudarstvennoj dumy (Informational Channel of the Russian State Duma), there federalnyje zakony podpisanyje prezidentom RF (Federal laws signed by president of the Russian Federation), choose year 2001 and search 26 ijulja, c. N 103-F3 (July 26, 2001, number N 103-F3), O vnesenii dopolnenija v statju 6 federalnogo zakona ob oruiii (addendum to the article 6 of the Federal law on weapons) 
31) Search www.rambler.ru and then (type in Russian alphabet) gosudarstvennaja duma, next informacionnyj kanal gosudarstvennoj dumy (informational channel of the State Duma), next search by use of "poisk" (search) Doktrina informacionnoj bezopasnosti Rossii, Doctrine of the Informational Security of the Russian Federation) there see pg. 3 Vidy informacionnych ugroz bezopasnosti Rossijskkoj federacii (Types of Threats to the Informational Security of the Russian Federation)
32) See ref. 31, pg. 19, Meidunarodnoje sotrudnicestvo Rossijskoj Federacii v oblasti obespecenija informacionnoj bezopasnoti (International Cooperation of the Russian Federation in Assuring the Informational Security).
33) See ref.23, pg. XVII or 33
34) See ref.23, pg. XLV or 61
35) See ref.23 pg. XLVI or 62
26)

37) 


New Article


                THE WORLD IS THREATENED BY INFORMATION WAR
                                                Mojmir Babacek

      In the document on U.S. military policy by Project for New American Century it is stated:

It is now commonly uderstood that information and other new technologies… are creating a dynamic  that may threaten America's ability to exercise its dominant military power. Potential rivals, such as China are anxious to exploit those transformational technologies broadly, while adversaries like Iran, Iraq and North Korea are rushing to develop ballistic missiles and nuclear weapons… [13].

 Does this mean that the threat of nuclear war is passing into history and will be replaced by "information war" in possible future major conflicts?
     In February 2000 the Russian daily Segodnya in the article Riders of Psychotronic Apocalypse [1] informed that in 1996 Russian government's information agency FAPSI warned that the effect of informational means of war is comparable to the effect of  use of weapon of mass destruction and produced a report entitled Information Weapon as a Threat to National Security of Russia. In reaction the Russian State Duma and then Interparliamentary Assembly of the Union of Independent States, as well, addressed the United Nations, OBSE and European Council with a proposal for an international convention banning the use of informational weapon and its circulation. According to newspaper Segodnya in March 1998 the matter was discussed with U.N. secretary general Kofi Anan and it was included on the agenda of General Assembly of the U.N. Most probably the USA vetoed this proposal.
     According to the director of FAPSI, Alexander Starovoitov,  the information attack could place out of order all electronic systems controling Russian defense as well as electronic systems of government infrastructure, transportation, energetics and nuclear systems. In this way the army would lose ability to fight and the government ability to direct defense of the country. It is known that such effect could produce an electromagnetic pulse following nuclear explosion, but the Russian daily Segodnya described in most of the article mysterious information-psychological means capable not only to harm human health (and according to Russian scientist A. F. Okhatrin  to kill people [2] ), but as well to block on subconscious level human free will, cause loss of ability of political, cultural and other self identification of human being and even cause destruction of indivisible informational and spiritual space of the Russian Federation. Underneath the article the daily Segodnya published a review of  weapons affecting human psyche which it obtained from the Russian Department of Defense. Together with ultrasound and microwave weapon there is listed as well psychotronic weapon which is, aside of capability to transfer information among people able to act on communication and electronic systems [1].
     In November 2000 the Committee on Security of the Russian State Duma stated that means enabling remote control of human nervous system or health impairment are available to many modern governments [3]. However there is no direct evidence in the public domain of the existence of such technologies except for sound and light technologies as is exemplified, for example, by psychowalkman industry. In the bill proposed by Dennis J. Kucinich in the U.S. House of Representatives in 2001 the following technologies enabling access to human brain, human health impairment or killing of people are named:

land-based, sea-based or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood managment or mind control of such persons or populations [4].

 The existence of the electromagnetic mind control technology is confirmed in the Conclusion of  the Committee on Security of the Russian State Duma [3]. As well in the Russian Federation the experiment with mass manipulation by microwave radiation was published [5]. Psychotronic weapon introduced in the Dennis J. Kucinich's bill is described as a torsion fields technology in the book Psychotronic Weapon and the Security of Russia by Vladimir Lopatin [6] (a politician, who worked on Committees on Security in Russian Federal Republic, State Duma of the Russian Federation and the Interparliamentary  Assembly of the Union of Independent States). Torsion fields is possibly a false term used  because of the National Security Information concerns as well as scalar fields used by military scientists in the USA. Scientific publications  on torsion and scalar fields are regularly available to readers and contain scientific mystifications. However the book on microleptonic fields. Microleptonic Conception by A. F. Okhatrin and V. Yu. Tatur, referenced in the bibliography of the book by V. Lopatin, is subject to the National Security Information law in the Russian Federation. (A. F. Okhatrin was the first Russian scientist to be approached by Russian journalists when they started their search for Russian mind control technology in 1990. He told them that microleptonic fields can act on human nervous system, impair human health or  kill human beings [2]). In 1991 a respected Russian scientist Victor Sedlecki published a statement in the Russian daily Komsomolskaya Pravda that psychotronic biogenerators are mass produced in the Soviet Union and were used during the failed coup d'etat against Gorbachov [7]. In the article with the interview with A. F. Okhatrin the microleptonic field is described as biofield as well [2] so the biogenerators are probably microleptonic generators. As well, while concepts of torsion and scalar fields are extremely divergent in their theoretical postulates, concept of microleptonic fields appears to be identical with the concept of subatomic particle beams named also in the bill by Dennis J. Kucinich proposed in the U.S. congress.
     Electromagnetic technology enabling remote control of functioning of human organism is subjected to National Security Information law in the USA [8] and technologies enabling access to human brain are subject to the same law  in the Russian Federation [9]. Under such condition the mass media and world general public can not get engaged in the ban of the use of those means. Clearly the ownership of such means of control  creates opportunity for any government which owns such means to use them against individuals without giving them any chance of legal defense. In this way the concept of the world respecting freedom and human rights is getting corrupt.
     Russian politician Vladimir Lopatin indirectly admitted the existence of people exposed to remote manipulations of their organisms in the Russian Federation by proposing  compensation for those people [14]. The article from the U.S. army weekly Defense News confirmed that mind control technologies were used by Israelis against Palestinians [12]. As well there are rumors that microwave mind control technology is being actually used by U.S. soldiers in Iraq [15].
     The Russian Federation [1] and The European Parliament (Resolution on the Environment, Security and Foreign Policy from January 28, 1999, Nr.A4-005/99)  have already proposed international ban of the use of such means and it seems rather evident that the major obstacle on the road toward the international ban of influencing of functioning of human organism is the government of the United States of America which, so far, made no effort, at the international scene, toward the ban of remote manipulation, health impairment or killing of human beings. Dennis J.  Kucinich, the author of the bill proposing the ban of deployment of "mind control" weapons in the U.S. congress in October 2001  was quoted to assert that those weapons actually exist and "those people who control them are deadly serious and intend to use them, if we don't stop the weaponisation of space" [10]
     V. Lopatin proposed in his book Psychotronic Weapon and the Security of Russia [11] a State Defense Initiative among the fundamental principals of which he suggested: "To    admit a c t u a l  f e a s i b i l i t y  of  informational p s y c h o t r o n i c  war  (as a matter of fact it is already taking place without declaration of war) and the  f e a s i b i l i t y of exerting violence by means of the u s e  of PSW (psychotronic weapons) [11]. Apparently without intervention of international organisations against remote manipulation of human organisms the secret arms race among the world governments may continue until the information war actually breaks out. In this way the human world may sink into some kind of virtual reality where the independence of human thinking, feeling and decision making will be destroyed as a part of an information war or, in the worst case, large masses of people may be killed  and unlike with nuclear weapons the world will still remain inhabitable for the winners.
     After the warning of the Russian government that U.S. invasion of Iran could have grave and unpredictable consequences,  president Bush stopped talking about military action in Iran. Probably the U.S. military preeminence in the world is no more as overwhelming as the Russian daily Segodnya wrote in the year 2000. With the rising oil crisis and ensuing new divide of the world along the lines of competition for access to the world oil reserves, as is proved by U.S. invasion of Iraq and development of Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, the world war could errupt. Will people accept irresponsibility of their governments or will they engage in the ban of classified means of remote control of fucntioning of human organisms and brains?
 
Petition to Amnesty International and International Red Cross asking those organisations  to publish a call for an international ban of remote manipulation of human organisms can be signed at the address http://www.petitionthem.com/?sect=detail&pet=2022
[1] http://web.iol.cz/mhzzrz - Russian original, concise English translation of Riders of Psychotronic Apocalypse
[2] http://web.iol.cz/mhzzrz - Russian original - English translation of the article The  Project Zombie is a Bluff or…?
[3] see Russian original - http://web.iol.cz/mhzzrz , translation: the Conclusion and Resolution of the Committee on Security of the Russian State Duma 
[4] http://thomas.loc.gov/home/c107query.html and search for Bill number h.r.2977
[5]http://web.iol.cz/mhzzrz - Russian original Installation Radiosleep
[6] http://www.mindjustice.org/russian.pdf pg. 27-37 concise overview of the book
 [7] Russian original - http://web.iol.cz.mhzzrz , English translation - Authors of Project Zombie Discovered in Kiev.
[8]  http://web.iol.cz/mhzzrz - see memorandum of the Department of the Air Force, Assembly State of New York and Communicating via the Microwave Auditory Effect
[9] http://web.iol.cz/mhzzrz - Russian original - Secret Superweapon in Action
[10] see the article from Berkeley Daily Planet
[11] http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm - at the end of the site
[12] http://web.iol.cz/mhzzrz - Israel Fields Means to Suppress Palestinian Violence
[13] http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf , pg. 4
[14] http://www.mindjustice.org/russian.pdf pg. 36
[15] http://www.willthomas.net/Convergence/Weekly/Microwaving_Iraq.htm

(http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm may be temporarily unavailable due to the provider's effort to collect fees from the users)

TO INTERNATIONAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE of AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL

CALL ON THE GLOBAL BAN OF REMOTE MANIPULATION OF HUMAN BEINGS

            PETITION to the:
            INTERNATIONAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE of AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL

               Ladies and Gentlemen

     There exists evidence that  technical means enabling remote control of human nervous system are being developed by many modern governments (see the attached copies of the Conclusion and Resolution of the Committee on Security of the Russian State Duma or http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm). The Russian Federation  (see the attached article in the Russian daily Segodnya ) and The European Parliament (http://www4.europarl.eu.int/registre/recherche/RechercheSimplifiee.cfm and search for the Resolution on the Environment, Security and Foreign Policy from January 28, 1999)  have already proposed international ban of the use of such means. However there is no direct evidence in the public domain of the existence of such technologies except for sound and light technologies as is exemplified by psychowalkman industry. In the bill proposed by Dennis J. Kucinich in the American House of Representatives in 2001 the following technologies enabling access to human brain are named:

land-based, sea-based and space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management or mind control of such persons or populations

(http://thomas.loc.gov/home/c107query.html and search for the Bill number h.r. 2977).
 In the conclusion of the Committee on Security of the Russian State Duma the existence of electromagnetic mind control technology is confirmed. Psychotronic weapons mentioned in the Dennis J. Kucinich's bill and described in the (attached) book by Vladimir Lopatin (a Russian politician who worked on Committees on security in Russian Republic, Russian State Duma and parliament of the Union of Independent States) as torsion fields technology (http://www.mindjustice.org/russian.pdf - concise English contents, pg. 27 - 37 - the information war is discussed as well).
After some research we assume that torsion fields is a false term used because of the National Security Information concerns as well as scalar fields used by military scientists in the USA - however we found out that the book on leptonic fields: Microleptonic Conception by A. F. Okhatrin and V. Yu. Tatur, referenced in the bibliography of the book by V. Lopatin is subject to the National Security Information law in the Russian Federation. (A. F. Okhatrin was the first Russian scientist to be approached by Russian journalists when they started their search for Russian mind control technology in 1990.)
The concept of leptonic fields may be identical with the concept of subatomic particle beams named in the bill proposed by Dennis J. Kucinich in the USA. Among known new physical concepts the non-local electron connection and soliton waves could be used for the manipulation of human brain activity as well and with the miniaturisation and development of nanotechnology the use of implants comes into question as a very probable technology to be used for the same purpose.

     We are presenting you, in the attachments, evidence that electromagnetic technology enabling remote control of human nervous system is subject to National Security Information law in the United States of America and that technologies enabling access to human brain are subject to the National Security Information in the Russian Federation as well. Under such condition the mass media and world general public can not get engaged in the ban of the use of  of those means. Clearly the ownership of such means of control  creates opportunity for any government which owns them to use them against individuals without giving them any chance of legal defense and leaving them with a strong probability to be treated in mental hospitals. In this way the concept of democracy and the prospect of the democratic world is being corrupt.
     We are aware that many individuals adressed your organisation with requests for help which you have denied to them claiming that the sole affaire you are concerned with, according to your statutes, are prisoners of conscience. Permit us to quote from the book of one of the first persons to advocate the abuse of human rights based on the manipulation of human nervous system (by electrical current in this particular case):

In the past the individual could face risks and pressures with preservation of his own identity. His body could be tortured, his thoughts and desires could be challenged by bribes, by emotions, and by public opinion, and his behavior could be influenced by environmental circumstances, but he allways had the privilige of deciding his own fate, of dying for an ideal without changing his mind…New neurological technology, however, has a refined efficiency. The individual is defenseless against dicrect manipulation of the brain…

(Jose Delgado, 1969, neurophysiologist at the Yale University, from the book Physical Control of the Mind, Toward a Psychocivilized Society). Could  not you understand from this text, which is now 36 years old, with  technologies providing acces to mind and brain  advancing in great strides in the past decades, that perhaps the statutes of your organisation are not up to date with the technological advances of this world?.
Now, we read in the statutes of your organisation that

Amnesty International's mission is to undertake research and action focused on preventing and ending grave abuses of the rights to physical and mental integrity, freedom of conscience and expression, and freedom from discrimination…

As well we read in your statutes that the

functions of the International Executive Committee are to take international decisions on behalf of AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL…to make any necessary adjustments to the Integrated Strategic Plan and other decisions  of the International Council…" and  "to ensure compliance with the Statute.

Therefore we strongly believe that, according to your statutes, your organisation is capable to defend human rights even in the changing modern world. We are aware that having no evidence you can not take direct action on anyone's behalf (unless you get engaged in the research of  methods of detecting the signals used for the remote manipulation of human brain). Attached we are mailing you the article from the American publication Defense News asserting that those technologies were used by Israelis against Palestinians. As well there are rumors that microwave mind control technology is being actually used in Iraq (see Microwaving Iraq http://www.willthomas.net/Convergence/Weekly/Microwaving_Iraq.htm).

   In any event your decision, in your capacity as the most respected organisation in the world defending human rights, to pay attention to this kind of human rights abuse would create a new world climate. We would greatly appreciate if you published a document criticizing present situation in the world where you would call for enactment of laws, around the world, prohibiting remote manipulation of human nervous system by technical means in a verifiable manner. This would require organisation of governments' laboratories capable to detect the mind control signals aimed at individual  citizens of states (and foreigners coming to those states from abroad and asking for verification of their claims) as well as at whole populations. Those laboratories should publish their findings in case that they would detect signals capable to influence the activity of human brain and their source. In the legislation of all states around the world the penalties should be set for the use of technology enabling remote control of human brain's functioning.
     From the attached documents it seems to be rather evident that the major obstacle on the road toward the ban of manipulation of human mind by technical means is the government of the United States of America which made no effort, at the international scene, toward the ban of manipulation of human beings by technical means so far. Perhaps a publication of your document on this subject would help to oblige the U.S. government to participate in the effort to ban internationally the manipulations of human nervous system by technical means. Dennis J. Kucinich, the author of the bill proposed in October 2001 in the United States, was quoted to assert that those weapons actually exist and

those people who control them are deadly serious and intend to use them, if we don't stop the weaponization of space

(see the atttached article from Berkeley Daily Planet http://www.berkeleydaily.org/text/article.cfm?issue=06-03-05&storyID=21550).
If such weapons are used from the space it would definitively mean a massive abuse of human rights of whole populations.
     Apparently without the pressure of human rights organisations on governments the secret arms race among the world's governments will continue endlessly. Let us add that in underdeveloped countries of the world the numbers of people complaining that the functioning of their nervous system is being remotely manipulated are negligible or none, compared to the Russian Federation and USA, which are best known for their mind control research, (as you can see from the attached statistics) - most probably in each of those two countries there are over 2000 people making such complaints. Russian politician Vladimir Lopatin, who worked on several security committees in the Russian Federation and Union of Independent States, indirectly admitted (in the attached book) the existence of people exposed to mind control manipulations in the Russian Federation by proposing  compensation for such people (http://www.mindjustice.org/russian.pdf pg.36).
     Without intervention of human rights organisations against remote manipulation of human nervous system the human world may sink into some kind of virtual reality where prisoners of conscience will be defended, but the independence of human thinking, feeling and decision making will be destroyed as a part of an "information war".

     We will greatly appreciate your qualified reply to this our petition.
 
ATTACHMENTS

Collection of copies of Russian newspaper's articles on the subject of mind control technology, its probable use and the fact that it is classified in Russian Federation and the article in the newspaper Segodnya descibing a Russian iniciative at the United Nations to enact a global ban of the use of mind control technology (with an article recently published in the New Dawn magazine and using the English quotations from those articles)

  •      A book by Russian politician Vladimir Lopatin Psychotronic War (in Russian together with English translation of some parts of it )
  • Documents proving that mind control technology is subject to National Security Information law in the USA (response to FOIA request by Margo Cherney and response to a letter by Eleanor White to the deputy of New York Assembly)
  • Working document for STOA panel of the European Parliament entitled Crowd Control Technologies http://www.europarl.eu.int/stoa/publi/pdf/99-14-01-a_en.pdf
  • Copies of U.S. military publications (open to the public) proving that mind control technology is being developed in the USA
  • Copy of the article in the American Defense News magazine where an Israeli general claims that mind control technology was tested on Palestinians
  • A booklet Psychoelectronic Threat to Democracy, describing the feasibility of human brain manipulation by means of electromagnetic waves http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm
  • World statistics of suspected mind control experimantation
  • Copy of the e-mail correspondence between the British Green Party and Ruth Barnett
  • The article in Russian Newspaper Pravda with interview with a renown Russian scientist Igor Smirnov on mind control and possiblity of information war - http://www.english.pravda.ru/science/19/94/379/14567_.html

SIGNATURES

  1. Verein gegen geheime Versuche am Menschen, Koblenz, Germany
  2. Moskovski Ekologiczeski Komitet,  Russian Federation
  3. Sosiki hanzai tosite aru mionai tekunorogii niyoru higaisya no kai, Japan,
  4. http://www2u.biglobe.ne.jp/~mcva-jp/l
  5. Obcanske sdruzeni za zakaz manipulace lidske nervove soustavy radiofrekvencnim zarenim, http://web.iol.cz/mhzzrz/webstranka.htm, Czech Republic
  6. Citizen's Initiative Omega , Germany
  7. Collectif Contre Les Abus Dus aux Psychotechnologies, http://members.aol.com/ccapt2001/, France
  8. Mind Justice,  http://www.mindjustice.org , USA
  9. Ctizens Against Technological and Covert Harassment,
  10.  http://www.c-a-t-c-h.ca , Canada


TO INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS and INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF RED CROSS AND RED CRESCENT SOCIETIES

CALL FOR THE GLOBAL BAN OF MANIPULATION
                      OF HUMAN BEINGS BY TECHNICAL MEANS

         PETITION to the:
         INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS
         and
         INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION
         OF RED CROSS AND RED CRESCENT SOCIETIES

               Ladies and Gentlemen

     There exists evidence that  technical means enabling remote control of human nervous system are available to many modern governments (see the attached copies of the Conclusion and Resolution of the Committee on Security of the Russian State Duma or  HYPERLINK http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm). The Russian Federation see the attached article in the Russian daily Segodnya and The European Parliament ( HYPERLINK http://www.europarl.eu.int/registre/recherche/RechercheSimplifiee.cfm http://www.europarl.eu.int/registre/recherche/RechercheSimplifiee.cfm and search for the Resolution on the Environment, Security and Foreign Policy from January 28, 1999)  have already proposed international ban of the use of such means. However there is no direct evidence in the public domain of the existence of such technologies except for sound and light technologies as is exemplified by psychowalkman industry. In the bill proposed by Dennis J. Kucinich in the U.S. House of Representatives the following technologies enabling access to human brain are named:

land-based, sea-based or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood managment or mind control of such persons or populations.
( HYPERLINK http://thomas.loc.gov/home/c107query.html http://thomas.loc.gov/home/c107query.html and search for Bill number h.r.2977). ¨

In the Conclusion of of the Committee on Security of the Russian State Duma the existence of the electromagnetic mind control technology is confirmed. Psychotronic weapons mentioned in the Dennis J. Kucinich's bill in the USA are described in the attached book by Vladimir Lopatin (a politician, who worked on Committees on Security in Russian Federal Republic, State Duma of the Russian Federation and the parliament of the Union of Independent States) as a torsion fields technology
( HYPERLINK http://www.mindjustice.org/russian.pdf
http://www.mindjustice.org/russian.pdf - concise english contents pg. 27 - 37 - the information war is discussed as well).
After some research we assume that torsion fields is a false term used  because of the National Security Information concerns as well as scalar fields used by military scientists in the USA. However we found out that the book on leptonic fields Microleptonic Conception by A. F. Okhatrin and V. Yu. Tatur, referenced in the bibliography of the book by V. Lopatin, is subject to the National Security law in the Russian Federation. This concept of leptonic fields may be identical with the concept of subatomic particle beams named in the bill by Dennis J. Kucinich proposed in the U.S. congress. Among known new physical concepts the non-local electron connection and soliton waves could be used for the manipulation of human brain activity as well and with the miniaturisation and development of nanotechnology the use of implants comes into question as a very probable technology to be used.
     We are presenting you, in the attachments, evidence that electromagnetic technology enabling remote control of human nervous system is subjected to National Security Information law in the USA and that technologies enabling access to human brain are subject to the same law  in the Russian Federation. Under such condition the mass media and world general public can not get engaged in the ban of the use of those means. Clearly the ownership of such means of control  creates opportunity for any government which owns such means to use them against individuals without giving them any chance of legal defense and leaving them with a strong probability to be treated in mental hospitals. In this way the concept of the world respecting freedom and human rights is getting corrupt. In the preamble of the statutes of your organisation we read that

Its purpose is to protect  life and health and to ensure respect for the human being and to prevent and alleviate human suffering wherever it may be found.

Then in the statutes we read that one of your functions is

to assist… in the promotion and development of international humanitarian law and collaborate… in the dissemination of this law.

    Attached we are mailing you the article suggesting that mind control technologies were used by Israelis against Palestinians. As well there are rumors that microwave mind control technology is being actually used by U.S. soldiers in Iraq (see the article Microwaving Iraq  HYPERLINK http://www.willthomas.net/Convergence/Weekly/Microwaving_Iraq.htm http://www.willthomas.net/Convergence/Weekly/Microwaving_Iraq.htm).
     Your decision, in your capacity as the most respected organisation in the world fighting against human suffering, to pay attention to this kind of abuse of human beings would create a new world climate. We would greatly appreciate if you published a document criticizing present situation in the world where you would call for enactment of laws, around the world, prohibiting remote manipulation of human nervous system by technical means in a verifiable manner. This would require organisation of governments' laboratories capable to detect the mind control signals aimed at individual citizens of states (and foreigners coming to those states from abroad and asking for verification of their claims) as well as at whole populations. Those laboratories should publish their findings as to the detected mind control signals and their sources. In legislations around the world, the penalties for the use of mind control technologies should be enacted.
    From the attatched documents it seems rather evident that the major obstacle on the road toward the international ban of manipulation of human nervous system by technical means is the government of the United States of America which made no effort, at the international scene, toward the ban of manipulation of human beings by technical means so far. Perhaps a publication of your document on this subject would help to oblige the U.S. government to participate in the effort to ban internationally the manipulation of human nervous system by technical means. Dennis J. Kucinich, the author of the bill proposing the ban of deployment of "mind control" weapons in the U.S. congress in October 2000  was quoted to assert that those weapons actually exist and

those people who control them are deadly serious and intend to use them, if we don't stop the weaponisation of space

(see the article from Berkeley Daily Planet  HYPERLINK http://www.berkeleydaily.org/text/article.cfm?issue=06-03-05&storyID=21550 http://www.berkeleydaily.org/text/article.cfm?issue=06-03-05&storyID=21550 ).
If such weapons are deployed in the space they can be used for the manipulation of nervous functions of whole populations and this would definitively mean an unprecedented, massive, abuse of human beings.
     Apparently without the pressure of international organisations on governments the secret arms race among the world's governments will continue endlessly. Let us add that in underdeveloped countries of the world the numbers of people complaining that the functioning of their nervous system is being remotely manipulated are negligible or none, compared to the Russian Federation and USA, which are best known for their mind control research, (as you can see from the attached statistics) - most probably in each of those two countries there are over 2000 people making such complaints (see the attachments). Russian politician Vladimir Lopatin indirectly admitted (in the attached book  HYPERLINK http://www.mindjustice.org/russian.pdf http://www.mindjustice.org/russian.pdf pg. 36) the existence of people exposed to mind control manipulations in the Russian Federation by proposing  compensation for those people.
     Without intervention of international organisations against remote manipulation of human nervous system the human world may sink into some kind of virtual reality where the independence of human thinking, feeling and decision making will be destroyed as a part of an "information war".
     We are mailing a similar petition to the International Executive Committee of the Amnesty International perhaps you could cooperate with them in this matter.

     We will appreciate your qualified reply to this our petition.

Obcanske sdruzeni za zakaz manipulace lidske nerove soustavy radiofrekvencnim zarenim,   HYPERLINK http://web.iol.cz/mhzzrz/ , Czech Republic

  1. Verein gegen geheime Versuche am Menschen, Koblenz, Germany
  2. Moskovski Ekologiczeski Komitet . Russian Federation
  3. Sosiki hanzai tosite aru mionai tekunorogii niyoru higaisya no kai.  HYPERLINK http://www2u.biglobe.ne.jp/~mcva-jp/11shikin.html , Japan
  4. Citizen's Initiative Omega , Germany
  5. Collectif Contre Les Abus Dus aux Psychotechnologies,  HYPERLINK http://members.aol.com/ccapt2001/ ,France
  6. Mind Justice,  HYPERLINK http://www.mindjustice.org , USA
  7. Citizens Against Technological and Covert Harassment,  HYPERLINK http://www.c-a-t-c-h.ca/ , Canada
  8. Christians Against Mental Slavery, Great Britain                

Attachments:

  1. A book by Russian politician Vladimir Lopatin: Psychotronic War Documents proving that mind control technology is subject to National Security Information law in the USA (response to FOIA request by Margo Cherney and response to a letter by Eleanor White to the deputy of New York Assembly)
  2. Collection of copies of Russian newspaper's articles on the subject of mind control technology, its probable use and the fact that it is classified in Russian Federation and the article in the newspaper Segodnya descibing a Russian iniciative at the United Nations to enact a global ban of the use of mind control technology (with an article recently published in the New Dawn magazine and using the English quotations from those articles)
  3. Copies of U.S. military publications (open to the public) proving that mind control technology is being developed in the USA
  4. Copy of the article in the American Defense News magazine where an Israeli general claims that mind control technology was tested on Palestinians
  5. A booklet Psychoelectronic Threat to Democracy, describing the feasibility of the brain manipulation by means of electromagnetic waves.
  6. ( HYPERLINK http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/weebpage.htm 
  7. World statistics of suspected mind control experimantation
  8. ( HYPERLINK http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm)
  9. Copy of the e-mail correspondence between the British Green Party and Ruth Barnett

Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation

Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation 

    
STATE DUMA

Committee on Security

 CONCLUSION

 On the project of Federal law "On Inclusion of Addendum to the Article 6 of the Federal law "On weapon".

     The draft of the law proposes an addendum to Article 6 of the Federal law "On Weapons" with a regulation, in accordance with which the circulation, in a civilian and military capacity, of weapons and other objects, the offensive
operations of which are based on the use of electro-magnetic radiation, infra-sonic radiation and ultra-sonic radiation, is prohibited on the territory of the Russian Federation.
     The achievements of contemporary science and technology made possible the development of informational and psychophysiological technologies which allow for the creation of means and methods of secret, remote influence on the psyche and physiology of a person or of a group of people.  There exists a wide spectrum of means enabling guaranteed change of the way of thinking of a human being, programing of his behavior, interfereing with the adequacy of his reactions or artificially bringing about symptoms of dependency.
     Audio-visual influencing is accomplished through auditory or optical channels, when very weak, low-thresholds irritations, which are not consciously perceived, are instilled deeply into the subconsciousness and
imperceptibly orient thinking and behavior of a person in a predetermined direction.
     With the use of ultrasound, thermal or mechanical effects of elastic waves above 100 Hertz, not perceiveable by a human being, exert influence on thought structures and nervous system, provoke headaches, dizziness,
deterioration of the visual perception and breathing, and convulsions which can lead to the loss of consciousness.
     The use of infrasound (very low frequencies, below 16 Hz) of low intensity (about 120 decibels) causes  nausea, ringing in the ears, deterioration of vision, fear. The sound of medium intensity (until 130 decibels) destructs the digestive system and the brain, causes paralysis and sometimes blindness. The effects of infrasound above 130 decibels  may cause in the subject the arrest of heart activity.
     The effects of microwave radiation cause false perception of reality, weariness, dizziness, headaches, may cause damage to heart, brain, central nervous system. Phone lines, heating and sewer pipes, TVs, fire signalisation can be used as transmitting antennas.
     Practically all around the world the work on "methods of hidden influence upon  human psyche" is considered to be a priority and rates among the most important technologies of the 21st century. Developed countries enter into their military doctrines articles on preferable use of non-lethal weapons as  first weapons to be used in local conflicts, which allows to win conflicts with the smallest losses not only among their own soldiers, but as well among the
soldiers of the enemy.
     At the initiative of the USA, within the framework of NATO, there was a special group formed to work on the perspective use of the means with non- lethal effects and to coordinate the works in this area which are taking place in Great Brittain, France, Germany and Danemark. Generators created by the Institute of Chemical Technologies in Frankfurt (Germany) are intended to be used against big crowds during mass disorders. The radiation of the latest
French installation is capable not only to penetrate concrete and armor, but as well to destruct them very fast. According to the information of mass media the Great Brittain performed, in 1995 in Northern Ireland, field tests of non-lethal weapon for the dispersal of crowds. There are facts suggesting  the use of electromagnetic weapon against citizen's establishments in Yugoslavia in 1999.
     The creation of offensive infra-sonic devices was declared a priority in the USA among all the developments in the area of non-lethal weapons. According to the evaluation of military specialists, the U.S. army is capable to stop, with the use of unmanned plane using lethal microwave generator, an enemy ship with landing force several hundreds meters away from the shore. According to the estimate of the Stockholm International Institute of World Problems (SIPRI), in the next two years expenditures of the USA for the development and  purchase of non-lethal weapons will exceed one billion of dollars.
     At present time the federal law "On Weapons" forbids, at the territory of the Russian Federation, the circulation of weapons, in quality of citizen's or armed services weapon, the offensive operations of which are based only on
radioactive radiations and biological factors, not taking into consideration the development of informational and psychophysical technologies, the use of which allows for hidden influence at the human psyche and physiology. This
gap in Russian legislature may be removed by introduction of corresponding addendum to the Federal law "On Weapons" which bears preventive characteristic. It does not interfere with the structure of existing law and fully
corresponds to its general intention - defense of life and health of citizens, guaranteeing of public safety.
     Based on this argumentation we propose that the project of  the federal law "On Introduction of Addendum to the Article 6 of the Federal Law "On Weapons", introduced by the Assembly of the Krasnojarsk region, is approved
in the first reading.

The chairman of the Comittee                                                        A. I. Gurov
 

        Federal Assembly - Parliament of the Russian Federation

                                         STATE DUMA

                                 Committte on Security

                                         RESOLUTION

From November 30, 2000                                      number 28/3
 
 

                            On the project of Federal Law
     "On the Introduction of Addendum to Article 6 of the Federal Law "On Weapons""

Having examined the draft of the Federal law On Introduction of Addendum to Article 6 of the Federal Law "On Weapons, the State Duma Committee on Security has ruled:

  • 1. To recommend that the State Duma adopt the draft of the Federal law "On the Introduction of Addendum to Article 6 of the Federal Law "On Weapons" in the first reading.
  • 2. To appoint as a second speaker on the draft law the deputy of the State Duma Iliukhin Victor Ivanovitsch.
  • 3. To dispatch the actual Resolution with the text of the draft law and all the accompanying documents to  the State Duma, for inclusion of the draft law for the plenary session of the State Duma on the 20th of December of the year 2000.
Committee representative
A. I. Gurov

TO THE GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF CHINA



Turnov, Czech Republic, XX, July, 2005
 
Dear Sirs,
 
We, the undersigned, are engaged in the movement for the ban of remote manipulation of human nervous system by technical means. We are aware that there is, in the army of the United States of America, in use a sound beam technology and there is a lot of documents proving that electromagnetic radiation is probably used for the same purpose. In the Russian literature on the subject of  remote manipulation of human brain the term "psychotronic weapons" is used as well as in the bill proposed by Dennis J. Kucinich to the U.S. congres in the year 2000, we do not know so far what technology does this term describe. We have found documents proving that the European Parliament as well as the Russian Federation made steps, at the international political scene, toward the ban of remote manipulation of human beings. We know, as well, that the United States of America made no effort to ban  remote manipulation of human brain at the international political scene so far at all.
The Peoples Republic of China is now one of the greatest world powers and its attitude toward the ban of the manipulation of  human nervous system by technical means matters a lot in possible international negotiations on this subject. For that matter we would like to ask you what is your position.  Could you, please, let us know whether the government of the People's Republic of China made any effort at  the international political scene to ban the use of devices enabling remote manipulation of the functioning of human brain in wars or in the civil life or both?
We will greatly appreciate your reply to this our question. We need to know your position on this subject in order to be better able to engage in our activity.
 

 HOME
Pagina scientifica
Microchips impiantati nel corpo umano e altre sopraffazioni e violazioni.
Testimonianze e dubbi
Links di organizzazioni e iniziative protettive
Links e citazioni su segnali di pericolo
Delgado e Skinner

Psychocivilization and its discontents

Per concludere... / accomplishment
Links Europei contro la Pedofilia, il Settarismo e gli Abusi Strutturati e/o Rituali.
Segnalazioni di Allarme: Internazionali
Attenzione alle informazioni fornite da autori sospetti 
Targeting the Human with Directed Energy Weapons : Dr. Reinhard Munzert

International

 We strongly recommend that the governments which truly care for human freedom, human rights organisations, mass media and the United Nations become aware of those facts and take the appropriate action. According to Russian newspapers and some Russian politicians about thirty countries in the present world are involved in mind control research aiming at the possibility to control human being at distance by means of manipulation of its nervous system by physical fields (in some cases the use of implants have been proved). 
The survey of people complaining of manipulation of their nervous system (below) proves that such people may be found in twenty, technologically advanced, countries of the world (the countries which are not presented in the statistics have no complaints of  nervous system manipulation on internet discussions lists or by regular mail). 
What is striking is the fact that the countries which are best known for mind control research - the Russian Federation and the USA have as well the highest numbers of people claiming manipulation of their nervous system. The number of such complaints in Japan is also alarming. 
We strongly recommend that the governments which truly care for human freedom, human rights organisations, mass media and the United Nations become aware of those facts and take the appropriate action.
  1. Citizens and Initiatives for the Protection against Electrosmog (Germany)
    Citizens Against Human Righst Abuse (USA) 
    Citizens Association for the Ban of Manipulation of Human Nervous System by Means of Radiofrequency Radiation (Czech Republic) 
    Moscow Committee for the Ecology of Dwellings (Russian Federation) 
    CCAPT (France) 
    Association Against Secret Experimentations on Humans (Japanese) 

E il più importante e riassuntivo:
International Movement for the Ban of Manipulation of Human Nervous System by Technical Means

WORLD STATISTICS OF SUSPECTED MIND CONTROL EXPERIMENTATION


Country---- Population in millions ---Number of people Verification

--------------- of inhabitants ---------claiming that they 

---------------------------------------------are victims of mind 

--------------------------------------------- control experimentation

Australia ------------20 ----------------------10-----------------------------

Belgium --------------10------------------------- 1---------------------------- 

Brazil -------------- 174-------------------------- 0----------------------------

Bulgaria -------------- 7.5------------------------ 0----------------------------

Canada --------------25------------------------- 25----------------------------

China------------- 1281--------------------------- 7--------------------------- http://chinesemindcontrol.blog-city.com

Czech Republic ---10--------------------------- 3--------------------------- 

Denmark -------------5.4--------------------------0---------------------------

Estonia ---------------1.4--------------------------0---------------------------

Finland ---------------5.2--------------------------3-------------------------- 

France --------------60---------------------------50-------------------------- 

Germany -----------82---------------------------23--------------------------

Greece -------------10.6---------------------------0--------------------------

Hungary -----------10------------------------------0---------------------------

India ------------1050-------------------------------1--------------------------

Ireland --------------3.9-----------------------------0--------------------------

Italy ----------------58-------------------------------7 (the count of visits of website dedicated to this problem in one day ) 

Japan -------------127----------------------------138--------------------------

Kazakhstan -------16.8-----------------------------0--------------------------

Korea South------48.6-----------------------------1------------------------- http://user.chollian.net/~antidew/

Mexico -----------104------------------------------1------------------------- 

Netherlands -------16------------------------------8-------------------------- 

New Zealand--------4------------------------------2------------------------ 

Norway--------------4.5----------------------------1------------------------- 

Peru-----------------29------------------------------0-------------------------

Philippines --------86------------------------------0-------------------------

Poland -------------38------------------------------3------------------------

Portugal------------10------------------------------0------------------------

Russia-------------144---------------------------400 (according to the Russian daily Komsomolskaya Pravda there might be much more: Komsomolskaya Pravda, June 6, 1992, V. Umnov, Kupite Ustroistvo dlia Slezki za sosediami)

Slovenia-------------2-------------------------------2-----------------------

South Africa------42-------------------------------0-----------------------

Spain --------------40-------------------------------3----------------------- 

Sweden--------------9------------------------------4----------------------- 

Switzerland --------7.4-----------------------------3---------------------- 

Taiwan ------------22-------------------------------1----------------------

Thailand---------- 64-------------------------------1---------------------- 

Turkey ------------69-------------------------------1---------------------- 

United Kingdom 60------------------------------31 http://www.slavery.org.uk 

United States ---293----------------------------595 http://www.raven1.net

http://www.mindcontrolforums.com

http://www.eharassment.ca/network.htm 

Venezuela------- 25--------------------------------0------------------------ 

Vietnam----------82--------------------------------0------------------------ 
 

 
HOME

Per concludere / Accomplishment

Opinioni o peggio: accuse? Opinion or accusation?

Libro / book

2022 Copyrights | aisjca-mft.org