Opinion or accusation? diAssociazione italiana,scientifica e giuridica,contro gli abusi mentali,fisici e tecnologici è distribuito con Licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Condividi allo stesso modo 4.0 Internazionale.
Opinion or accusation?
February 8 2017
#site_Search_engine, #assunption, #aphorisms, #watch, #crucial_advice, #Statement_of_meaning, #Method, #question_marks, #white_phosphorus, #purposes, #titles-content, #facts_not_opinions, #real-rational, #Bilderberg_Group_and_lobotomy, #Advanced_technologies, #fear
Motore di ricerca del sito / Site Search Engine
When you read this page it is worth to notice that this file appeared seriously "hacked" - swelling from 250kb to 504kb! - and becoming for many times QUITE IMPOSSIBLE to save in a "proper" presentation. Even during the very actual correction a lot of impromptu, useless "tags" appear, wasting its layout and even damaging its text.
The present file should continually be faced with the English new file renamed Fake-mysterious assaulters against biological targets: on its old bilingual page - Italian and English - and with its previous name Pseudo-misteri e coinvolgimenti biologici / Fake-mysteries on biological targets can be read as chapter on the Appendix of the current edition of the book: It's Abuse NOT Science Fiction
Explanation and purposes: "development towards evil and worsened evil"
Not always to describe development and evolutionary patterns of humankind hints towards agreeable matters, in fact "human evolutive patterns" can also advance towards evil and worsened evil: then so also ogres exist and not only as fairy tales characters. So it is compelling to think not only about "support" and "direction" as meaning of the arrow on the Italian title page of the below quoted bilingual site and Italian book - Bambini di IERI=adulti di oggi.Adulti di oggi->adulti di DOMANI - but also to recognize and to eventually oppose its bad side as possible third shared message: "against". Obviously here one can touch distressing subjects so open to question: just for such so important matter this bitter controversial file/chapter is presented in both languages and on two sites and books: the titles themselves: Opinioni, fatti, accuse? and Opinion, fact, complaint and controversia - as well as this one Opinion or accusation? and method - specifies that the real design and aims does be to refute any risk of misuse.
Castrated of parental instinct? Developmental advances or passive dependency? Such argument is largely deployed on the only Italian file of another site and related book at chapter 3, Imbroglio è il contrario di sviluppo, the more by the quote accompanying and explaining the title - To coil/embroil reflects to involve: it is to say the contrary of to develop - but here one can enlist and consolidate some of its - there only implicit - meanings, to begin from assumptions basic and then more at risk to mislead towards a worse series of consecutive misunderstanding. Studying the history of brutality and “special” criminals of past times could enable us to better understand those of the present: but it is surely easier to stun the masses with abhorrence and commotion, with gossip, impromptu supposition, tabloid journalism. This sensationalism which ignores history involves itself in the ephemeral present, favouring and “packaging” every time they happen shocking new stories in order to feed the collective “pseudo-caring” - or better sadism - of the masses.
It is too easy and so almost commonplace a strong sense of CONTRO/AGAINST "guilty" rather than a paying of attention to “victims”; “against” being an exaggeration - which takes in the naïve - of current events and so straightforward to be soon forgotten and replaced by others. Then implying to better precise these quotes on behalf of required answers owing to current controversies - giving thus the name of the parallel file of another site: controversia.htm. We wish also to make reference to the simpler title given on the same subject on this site: Opinions or accusations? drawing attention to the URL /method_engl.htm indicating clearly the methodology used - not elitist, not exclusive but general and concrete. Our endeavor does NO OPT for designate target: it is more than sure that to search and share a sure TRUTH is an aim too much pretentious and so our endeavor doesn't be on behalf of such a source of preconceived notion. But this means also that it rather should find and hold the most large amount of knowledge to be widespread and wide used: an offer which means notwithstanding a better potential ways to "thrive" or at least to unblock more functionl ways of protection. Although a source of even terrible risks is to mistake the real knowledge of REAL FACTS, to mislead inner body's occurences and feelings switching towards believed dynamics as coming from external world: however the foremost engagement of this whole work is never to choose; but if for us is mandatory either to avoid bare subjective description or - worse - to accept impressive misconception drawing to hoax, also our directive is never to be surprised and denying every circumstance.
Real is rational, but "rational" by itself doesn't means ever "true"Real is ever "what it is" but not always - or better too often - what seems "rational" does not be real. Then why and how here this quote? Which place has here this most famed excerpt from Hegel's reference?
The place of a "key word": what can be observed, proved and documented is real AS IT IS and therefore it has not to be interpreted.
Think for yourselves and let others enjoy the privilege to do so too.The phrase was invented by this later author as an epitome of his attitude. It comes from The Friends of Voltaire, written by Evelyn Beatrice Hall and published in 1906 under the pseudonym Stephen G. Tallentyre. Hall said that she paraphrased Voltaire's words in his Treatise on Toleration, which includes such thoughts as:
Not only is it extremely cruel to persecute in this brief life those who do not think the way we do, but I do not know if it might be too presumptuous to declare their eternal damnation.
But if as a rule this sentence sounds right, such a proposal should NOT be accepted when more or less unfair "opinions" are displayed, instead of DOCUMENTS and real DEEDS having their factual place. This file/chapter - as well the parallel file Opinion, fact, complaint present on another book as chapter 15- tries to explain the meaning to openly have shared this "lack of tolerance". In fact the knowledge of this file/chapter completes the whole site/book - It's Abuse NOT Science fiction - and also is worthy to precise Opinioni, fatti, accuse and Opinion, fact, complaint. On both books chapters shared examples, quotations - and more... are to be considered a better support to understand the real meaning of the whole underlying proposal. The different naming of URLs explains and settles and integrates the utter purpose of both files and sites/books: controversia alludes to content and occasion, method furthermore on reporting also additional politic topics establishes argumenting patterns of way to work.
Therefore if this work doesn't be a static gather of documentation and description, it requests to develop its knowledge by other people's asks and doubts and testimony: so it can become an open windows on largest scenarios, in a continually in progress communication based more on observed changing sight of FACTS than on an interchange of WORDS. So this means to wish a serious and profitable support of sure, authenticated, scientifically probed shared knowledge, but it is necessary to add again an explanatory codicil here to highlight the fundamental principles which underlie the approach to this work, in order to avoid at the outset not criticism – which is welcomed! – but misunderstandings and ambiguities.
Any way even if these basics are founded on a philosophic upbringing, the background of this work pertains to and comes from a very factual field: its aim is less to explain, to propose, to point out but the more to act when possible to protect and to care, to build and rebuild: surely NOT to accuse. This not in the name of a something as a "charitable goodness": as much as for a real critical attention to consider PROPORTION at disposal of the means and their - presumed - outcomes, of the presumed causes and the presumed consequences. This is also persistently and repeatedly brought to readers attention in every other file/chapter; it lends itself being presented as typical of the main point of view, or better still the methodological approach on which this work is realized. Its primary aim is not to discuss presumed opinions in ideological way, nor MUCH LESS to throw out at random hypothetical accusations: but rather to work in such a way that each assertion could be constituted as a document able to be corroborated and enhanced. Utterly only a document itself, which can clearly signal factual data could develop into information fruitful for further, better observations, as well for further doubts and for further searches. In this way it becomes an “open window” not to offer explanations but merely DESCRIPTIONS, documented and elucidated in iconographic and incontrovertible way, since also confirmed by checkable renewed sources and authoritative even - or better: for preference - first hand data.
Well-documented historical events resemble terrible facts of the present: for example that of the 15th century Gilles de Rais and the hundreds of children raped and killed by him alongside the troops he chose and supplied to Joan of Arc. But instead how easy it is to be CONTRO on the immdiate! How easy to focus on every single case in an exclusive and sensationalist manner, creating an almost fairy-tale villain of the presumed guilty! How many successive Bluebeards have there been, committing absolutely similar crimes, yet – and here they differ from Gilles de Rais e Dutroux - in full impunity? And on the contrary how many, maybe innocent, have been charged with witchcraft, put to death or, more currently been monsters making headline news in unredeemable ways?repressed sadistic instinct: expressing itself through the lynch-mob – perhaps not always merely ideological. Choices of the facile and populist road, important reports made public in a slipshod and imprecise way etc. risk the nullifying of the otherwise serious and difficult process of documentation, of testing evidence: thus seriously damaging again and again the actual victim.
While how many other authentic “monsters” live and have lived – well and long – quiet and honoured lives?
The most banal solutions are put forward by confused and ill-informed interviewers and appeals to generic better feelings (!!!) do not so much hush the deafening silence as revive and give incentive to the repressed sadistic instinct to express itself through the lynchmob – perhaps not always ideological. Choices of the facile and populist road, important reports made public in a slipshod and imprecise way, risk the nullifying of the otherwise serious and difficult process of documentation , of testing evidence; thus seriously damaging time and time again the actual victim. There is no need to believe in finding in every case (pseudo) heroes to whom evil submits and has been submitted to, or who pit themselves against evil; interior lack of well-being together with a sense of widespread injustice makes a collective risk of a feeling of inferiority/dependence a reality. In response to such feelings grows the desire to seek for absolutes – in which to believe and guides on which to rely on. The and the trust in a guide becomes absolutes are however unilateral exclusive and excluding with the inevitable malevolence and discord. The - presumed – good citizens face each other on either side of opposing views instead of collaborating; and it is in this climate of confusion that the slave morality tends to prevail, with the taking up of hostile positions if not “appeals” to lynch the presumed guilty instead of supporting and listening to the real victim with precise witness and solidarity. Experience – gradual over the years and of clinical concreteness – in the field of “reliving” previous childhood trauma started the Associazione and remains today as foundation of an important part of its work. However this interest has had to take on a wider aspect in as much as it has found itself faced with numerous other testimonies – internationally – from adults who are suddenly afflicted with suffering: unexpected and “strange” as those who have undergone unusual abuses. Here it has found itself ascertaining and verifying how – on a planetary scale. now as in the past – the abuse of children is part of the infinite mass of well differentiated abuse of every genre carried out between human beings – mental abuse, physical (and sexual) and also economical and technological. Studying the history of brutality and “special” criminals of past times could enable us to better understand those of the present: but is it not easier instead to stun the masses with abhorrence and commotion, with gossip, impromptu supposition, tabloid journalism? This sensationalism which ignores history involves itself in the ephemeral present, favouring and “packaging” every time they happen shocking news stories in order to feed the collective “pseudo-caring” - or better sadism - of the masses.
Why and how REAL IS RATIONAL? Why here this quote? Which place has here the most famed excerpt from Hegel's reference?
The place of a "key word": what can be observed, proved and documented is real AS IT IS and therefore it has not to be interpreted. In fact not always to describe children' life hints towards agreeable matters: in fact ogres exist and not only as fairy tales characters. So it is compelling to think not only about "support" and "direction" of the arrow on the title page, but also to recognize - to can fight - the "against" bad side. Obviously here one can touch distressing subjects so open to question: just for such so important matter this bitter controversial file/chapter is presented in both languages and on two sites and books: the titles themselves: Opinioni, fatti, accuse Opinion, fact, complaint and controversia - as well as method - specifies that the real design and aims does be to refute any risk of misunderstanding.
As another "key word" Sleeping reason breeding monsters accompanies many files in this site and the slightly modified world-famous Goya's table gives impact to the cover of the book It's Abuse NOT Science fiction, and as well another phrase what do I have in common with slaves, often cited in this site, stays at the base of the principal proposals of our research. But like to resolve a pronounced amnesia not only the unsaid should be unveiled but furthermore also bare words as themselves should be too often rejected: to know and discern how the false can hide underneath. Thus to be a victim is not an indubitable certificate of merit: to be or to have been a victim does not mean a personal characteristic of someone but merely that to this someone have happened or are happening damaging things. Unfortunately if to be or to have been “victims” does not mean to be heroes, even more “unfortunately” to be “heroes” does not automatically indicate integrity: on the contrary victims and heroes are often categories in which “slaves” typically are placed, those who - however they are – confuse the internal with the external, who live and believe to live within a system that does not stem from themselves but comes from the other/others: a people not only seeking dependence, but approval, consideration, admiration, seduction, dogma, belonging to, guide, prescription, predominance till seeing all this thereafter to switch on offense and PERSECUTION.
With almost embarrassment and fear of being taken as “negationists”, or as followers of Nietzsche or - very worse - Spengler we have cited the above aphorism about the outpouring of polemic and argument directed also at victims as well at their true or false helpers or defenders. It is instead our conviction that “slave morality” and “superman” are two sides of the same coin and of the same category, like that of the masses and the "refined minds". The emotional flattening of servile condescension and admiring exaltation or execration are two moments of the same... neurosis if not psychosis or of the same perversion... But even if highs and lows of myth-making and intense sentimentalism only take place occasionally it is ALWAYS SADISM and can produce or permit disastrous consequences. Without fear of offending anyone, as soon as new data or new answers make necessary adds this file continues to show our disassociation and opposition to all the clamor of hypothetical attribution and of “looking for monsters”, and stands against the sea of conspiracy theorists – in good or bad faith – without importance as to whether it is formed of victims or of intriguers.
"Neurosis", "perversions", "psychosis": we are shy to use terms which – we repeat UNFORTUNATELY – look as offensive and not accepted by many of those who suffer from them. It is not a question of “eradicating the irrationality of the masses” as asserted in a bizarre statement discussed heatedly elsewhere, but to understand that if there has not been a TRUE development from infancy to adulthood – in all its subsequent stages – then one endangers to believe in a artificial if not fraudulent recovery of the lost phases: mostly to divert on admiring ideas of “something” much more “grandiose”. To belong on a group, to follow preconceptions, common ideas, dogma, certainties of every genre, to long for serenity at any cost or disownment, to be keen of the idea of superman or the super-criminal on which one places ones' existential emptiness…: all this is not “irrationality” but symptoms of illness, either personal or - to be realistic - even more precisely sociological.
The - presumed – good citizens face each other on either side of opposing views instead of collaborating; and it is in this climate of confusion that the slave morality tends to prevail, with the taking up of hostile positions if not “appeals” to lynch the presumed guilty instead of supporting and listening to the real victim with precise witness and solidarity. Experience – gradual over the years and of clinical concreteness – in the field of “reliving” previous childhood trauma started the Associazione and remains today as foundation of an important part of its work. Here it has found itself ascertaining and verifying how – on a planetary scale. now as in the past – the abuse of children is part of the infinite mass of well differentiated abuse of every genre carried out between human beings – mental abuse, physical (and sexual) and also economical and technological.
There is no need to believe in (pseudo) heroes struggling against evil: on the contrary an interior lack of well-being, together with a sense of widespread injustice, makes the risk to increase and validate feelings of inferiority/dependence as a fixed reality. But it is in response to such feelings that grows the desire to seek for absolutes – in which to believe in - and guides on which to rely on. The absolutes are however unilateral and the trust in a guide becomes exclusive and excluding with the inevitable malevolence and discord. The - presumed – good citizens face each other on either side of opposing views instead of collaborating; and it is in this climate of confusion that the slave morality tends to prevail, with the taking up of hostile positions if not “appeals” to lynch the presumed guilty less difficult than to support and listen the real victims with precise witness and solidarity. This proposal should not undervalue and discard who wherever and at any age suffers for inexplicable "disorders". It is not necessary any accord to the banal parameters of a banal “culture of slavery”: just a real experience – gradual over the years and of clinical concreteness – in the field of “reliving” previous childhood trauma, started this site and task built to offer an address to whom seek for a better - neither mainstream nor "counter information" - knowledge, but also for finding a place where confirm and validate and exchange "strange experiences". But this knowledge resulted in a wider and wider aspects facing with numerous other international testimonies: not only by to relive past childhood harms and undergone unusual abuses, but also by adults suddenly afflicted with suffering unexpected and absolutely not customary. Ascertained and verified on a planetary scale, now as in the past, the abuse of children revealed to be part of an infinite mass of differentiated abuse of every genre – mental abuse, physical (and sexual) and also economical and technological - carried out on human beings by other wicked human beings; a lot of odd evil actions maybe on return financed (?) by the “business” of films using minors with an unheard sexual as much as also not only sexual cruelty and violence.
Resulting problems and responsibilities are therefore enormous: they require a secure connection and a solid and effective collaboration amongst those diverse realities, favoring everywhere and in whatever way the exchange of different experiences above all based on the impartial and un-programmed hearing of victims of every age, on the accurately selected credibility of each one: of each child now, but also of whoever, for however many years after, manifests through reliving the then “violated child”. Actual children, grown-up reliving their abused childhood, adults suffering for very "mysterious" harms become so allowed to heal from violation conserved within the interior, like a “cancer” which should have continued to impede the person from living a normal life: then so allowed to speak they can develop into faithful witness on regard of those experiences, no more at risk to be mistaken as mere "delusions". Unfortunately there is again and again the strong sense of CONTRO/ AGAINST "guilty" rather than real care of “victims”, whilst it is so far easy to appeal to impromptu, immediate “higher sentiments” in favor of a single “victim” or to refer to single and contingent “monsters” in order to hit the headlines. In a cascade of worsening, caution and doubts are coursed for encouraging discord and disorganization amongst those who seek or believe to act in good faith. But this carries on more and more worse consequences: at first instigating and fostering paranoid fantasies in the victims themselves locks them in a vicious circle where the reliability as witness questioned becomes make faithless. But vicious circles don't stop: screaming “higher sentiments” and/or appeals against "monsters" allure to protagonism a lot of idle people victims of very scanty damages or willing to appear as "heroic helper", if not a lot of fake victims when even of disguised perpetrators. To consider also that who wishes to join victims and their – also presumed and so-calling - defenders are often only exhibitionists seeking attention by calling public with clamorous appeals; but ever these clamorous campaigns, time after time demonizing single event and single nations, tend to forget them soon after and substituting with others. In fact working too often and too many in this field are those who propose and agitate along one single line of thought: taking up positions and “appeals” they are proud to incite the “lynching” of the presumed guilty, instead of giving solidarity and sustenance to the real victims: then victims real or fake or real or fake helpers and accusers considering from one aspect only the facts relevant to themselves, clash and thus unload their tensions in petty vindications. For example many “authoritative experts” consider in exclusivity only one restricted sector: in the combating of paedophilia, only one aspect of sexuality involving minors; other "defenders" who opposes the more generalized abuse of innocent citizens as “guinea pigs” don't recognize who tries to act against believed colluders of "bad medicine" or against “weapons of energy”. In sum up whoever wish to work in these important fields risks to finds himself branching off in a mass of separate groupings: in addition tending to confuse science, technology and the bad use of these with subjective conclusions passed off as absolutes. Individual groups acting more or less in good faith attack with disparaging campaigns the “competitors” and with appeals to the “cleansing of public conscience” promote – uselessly? – requests for signatures for eventual – and in their turn criminal – proposals for laws promoting "to geld" etc. In place of a serious and patient search for the truth and real PROTECTION of the victims, damage on damage, cruelty on cruelty widen more and more the wild circle of wickedness. Hoew easy is to prefer fatuous, ephemeral, gossipy, demonstrative susceptibilities and/or resentment to hinder real, deep, responsible INDIGNATION!
the creation of a culture of resentment, whose only solution was to do away with the "other". The fact is, the culture of resentment – pertaining to slave morality - is extremely diffuse. It is in the air everywhere, without being theorised. It grows and feeds on itself by the forces of inertia – it has no need of advertising or publicity.
Perhaps it is a universal truth that the loss of liberty at home is to be charged to provisions against danger, real or pretended, from abroad.- James Madison to Thomas Jefferson, May 13, 1798
>The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding. -Justice Louis Brandeis, 1928
We would eagerly keep a strict distance from counter information, alternative culturesHigh Politics, and/or worse through grosser ignorance of Highest Finance – build hypotheses, basically mythical “certainties” inherent with pseudo–sure reasons about the guilty “perpetrators” of their trouble. To simply ridicule as laughable narrow-minded's self-sufficiency is not a logical way to think or to do: mean persons often try "to promote" themselves taking a - selfish - advantage from personal mishaps, laying the blame on presumed "assured" knowledge of Affairs of State. Any way these pseudo-sure "knowledge" - the more if selfish, poor and constrained and fixed and unilateral - drags behind shared assumptions of great world plots, conspiracy theories set up by “perpetrators” who they consider not only generically hostile and malign but also a direct cause of their suffering. Not only do we keep our distance but we are above all in direct cause of their own private open opposition to anything which cannot be factually proved: in particular if this causes sect-like ideological groupings. Any grouping exclusively focussed on fighting a “common enemy” is basically structured like a sect, meaning like a non-homogenous entity united exclusively to incorporate individuals and entities coming from very different situations.They are united not through any sense of real cooperating community but by a blind hostility. United because they are only against a common enemy: real or more or less hypothetical but however characterised to be beyond any effective opposition other than symbolic action.
Titles should prevail over the content? Should the not yet known be mislead with "Occult" as opposite of “cultured”? Should what is considered by mainstream culture as "odd" be mistaken with parapsychological knowing or Devilish mystery - "D" capital - or coming from UFOs? The Association, website and book, define themselves as actively “against mental abuse” as well as against “physical and technological”: it is worthy to take this opportunity to stigmatise the possibility of PROPAGANDA, or the diffusion, also involuntarily, of disinformation via a mental mechanism to superficialize knowledge of the ways in which titles and sentimental yells manage to prevail over descriptive content, in which occasional emotionalism over working learning. More generally, called to give evidence, we have to answer with a dry series of comments or better have to ask everyone and ourselves a series of questions - rhetorical because we already know the possible answers. For many years now strident, flag-waving repetitive and resonant copies of testimonials of suffering victims have circulated - even if at times denied – and the victims regroup in Associations and Discussion Forums: but over-numerous to be all faithful and too often litigious to be efficient. One asks what is the geo-political provenance of this cultural mass, willing to transmit alarms: does unfortunately be an hidden decoy deviating attention towards an unequivocal enemy a series of things rendered as unrecognisable collusions? In the hands of the wizards of communication - like the worst political machination of the whole series of “pseudo-certainties”, “pseudo-causalities” – stand fake certainties if not the absolute attribution of “guilt”. Screaming propaganda indicates Nations, populations, organisations etc. as the indiscutable sites of absolute evil: does one not instead ask why and how only this news circulates? Is there an underlying real reason orx is it not more simply and logically because in some countries rather than others EXISTS still(?) a RELATIVE freedom of speech and of the press? CIA as the bogeyman for children, Belgium as a corrupt nation home to wicked paedophile murderers; Scandinavia as the place where one is tortured from birth? Does no-one ask if it is logical that the rest of the world is a kind of Paradise? Does one really ask what happens and has happened? Is it not that Americans, Scandinavians, Belgians have still (?) a certain freedom of speech and of the press? What do the direct witnesses say with documents, photos, surveys of place etc.? What is revealed?
Sided by the introductory file/chapter Presentazione e indice ragionato: come cominciare / Preamble: how to begin this file\chapter presents the preliminaries of a study and research METHOD aiming at concrete actions and moreover at a precise disavowal to not being confused our work wirh unconvincing, "simple" chatty rumors. For example David Icke - "tells" - in fact "tells" as being "novels" - some excerpts of serious deeds, presented on a fair style - indeed "novel-like"! - which mixes reality and fantasy in an apparent not-fiction, or worse: spreading on purpose some truth and some damaging data promoting a lot of fake-assured misinterpretations.
Chicken or eggs? Which is the first problem?Or better: has to be preminent the will to persecute the culprit instead to consider his victim? Or then: will the victims be harmed again and again?
...victims (lay people) have a tendency to forget about the patient (very often a victim) and to concentrate on the source of evil (whatever it is in our beliefs)
Such irresponsible words express very clearly one of the utter difficulty to prevent damages and harms, to care and to promote a real justice: in sum up to can positively help real suffering people, to ascertain true ones from fake plaintive of worse from wolves in sheep’s clothing - and/or to positevely act in real behalf of whom is really needing help.
On the contrary, thoroughly prepared from decades, the purposes of book(s), site(s) and related researches at present can broadly share a deep awareness by actual present observations, but also coming from more or less easy or painful testimonies of past times and occurrences. Besides to consider that just from painful memories also arises a concrete possibility to open a new general understanding: a knowledge giving the possibility, beyond the real practicability to care and mend, also to protect, and even - if convenient - to officially denounce but surely only when well prepared by getting facts, matters, situations on an assured KNOWLEDGE. Any way this whole work has the task to document but else to learn by matching asks: both previous awareness and other people's assumption and doubts can open towards a serious and profitable exchange of sure, authenticated, scientifically worthly to be probed intelligence. Of course from "external world" some real damages occur: but to fight them "bare hands" is a very disproportionate struggle, disproportionate even if not surely defeating. In fact the indispensable and ever lasting and ever prepared to WATCH has continually to protect for avoiding against unfortunately COMMON traps: not inconsistent but very serious since pushing to engage in inadequate conflicts not considering proportion between - real or presumed - forces and effects. In fact a source of even terrible risks does to mistake hoaxes with the real knowledge of REAL FACTS, as well to mislead inner body's occurrences and feelings switched towards believed dynamics coming from external world.
Thus not only should stop to describe every not enough precise and specified data: on the contrary it is mandatory to avoid every inference regarding not well supported occurrences, every boasting battles against too much "high" High Powers as against a wide "common sense", against unknowable, hidden enemies as against the unawareness of lay-people. Such a fight can put forward with some hope to succeed merely if pointing out and warning against them in a way the most precise, seriously studied, accurate defined: yet AVOIDING bare words or pitiful moaning one can fight To recognize the reality of "human external world", its connections, oppositions, changeable alliances is difficult even for inside trained people: how awful consequences could bring about to misunderstand facts with "opinions" and "feelings", and the "master way" to confuse "friends" with "enemies" and vice versa! How much fallacious is the forthcoming when deceptive naivety or obtuseness assure to be aware of who are the culprits and their plans to act! how", "when" and "where"! Unfortunately we find ourselves at times reluctantly constrained not to ignore but to fight against empty objections and ... idle chatter of those who approach these pages believing them to be the fruit of mere “opinions”! How to warn – with trouble and also with apprehension – those who, faced with “abnormal situations” shoot haphazardly without preparation and with unprovable accusations. It is for this reason that we WILL publish only anomalies and memories which are truly clearly definable, and not any data and/or testimonial and/or shared story even if reliable in the long term. Any grouping exclusively focussed on fighting a “common enemy” is basically structured like a sect, meaning like a non-homogenous entity united exclusively to incorporate individuals and entities with very different situations united not through any sense of real cooperating community but by a blind hostility towards a homogenous enemy. United because they are against a common target: real or more or less hypothetical but however characterized to be beyond any effective opposition other than symbolic action.
Of “vital” importance? Naivety falling into superstitious gullibility and so open to foster “sect-like” organizations? Or even "derelict" persons ready to be involved in "Cult-like" groups?Sects or similar “cliques” offer support and consolation to frail people in search of a pseudo “happiness”, to sick people who aspires to the indifference of a confined “serenity”: not for nothing Delgado himself wrote a book entitled La Felicidad, rather than only express his ferocious principles in his research into a Psychocivilized Society. Or else they welcome and “console” the more desperate victims mourning over their fate. Real mishaps or real and documented suffering are so collectively and indiscriminately given at general attention: not as proper afflictions but as ACCUSATIONS against the hypothetical common perpetrators. From this step where can we arrive: see The first humanitarian war in history: Hitler and the Sudetenlanders. Hitler and Sudetenlanders? A postponed terrible World War? One more year as gift to advantage Nazism? (Definitely any subject alluding to conspiracy, international plots, secret history and underground politics allures a morbid fascination for a lot of naive or aggressive or blatant people. Merely on searching books or videos checking these words an hotchpotch of assorted titles floods: even a lot of titles - near hundred! - not only racist but considering Hitler himself in various strange connection with Anglo-American powers.)
So built persecutory supporting groups have not to be confused with those focused instead on a very real COOPERATION, as happens for example in many associations of people ill from a particular pathology: their combined efforts being focused to better study their diseases and therefore better help doctors themselves.
When private individual "victims" complain for haphazard harms to be held and consoled, how harmful results such customary confusion! little querulous people's private lamentation being maximized with the sure consequence of a minimization of the biggest collective happening and collective crimes as slaughters, lagers, wars!
Of vital importance? How damaging can similar heterogeneous groups become also towards their own members! How many lay themselves open to the sneaking in of the true persecutors – the “wolves in sheep's clothing” – sects, cults, gangs, agents provocateurs, false victims, true - and just for this really sick and badly suffering - mads …: in every case real danger and certainly discredit! To act without knowledge of causes and with crass sermonizing, in disdainful ignorance, to engage oneself against hypothetical and elusive “enemies” instead of alleviate and/or avoid the real suffering and damage?
<The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding... Don't be men of zeal without understanding almost a clinical definition of paranoia? After all not only true delusional mads can endanger, every intimate psychic disorder as a good fostering ground of vulnerability enacts against the whole public well-being.
Neurosis absorbs anguish as a sponge.It is convenient, it gets as a mighty mummy.
Even mild Neurosis as personal, intimate disorder affects private freedom and impairsit gets as a sponge helping to absorb anguish... Neurosis itself is personal but affects a great deal of people, and then, when collective, this lessened existence could become everywhere a fertile ground fitting to foster superstitions: taboo as are duping prohibitions, but also compelling orders with even more RAGE and CRAZE.
So, often with inconsistent reason, whichever impromptu sharing a "neurotic concern" can become widespread; but also whoever tricky arrogant can enter in this so open pathway towards an indirect mind-control. Imposed as a new Totem, every bogus fear thus at first menaces proclaiming - hypothetic - forthcoming damages, and then offers pseudo-guarantees if the "mind-controlled" people follows so established hoaxes or even so accepted swindles.
Here we wish to send out a message and a caution of vital importance...Therefore the lot of discoveries so gathered - and this was a real surprise - got we aware that the SCATTERED diffusion of a lot of offensive tools resulted almost sure: as the matter of fact everyone can buy without difficulties every kind of actual weaponry, every one can buy often terrible and performing engines even at a very low price. On the height of damage many of such engines are sold for not harming uses: for amusement, for chasing rats, for sending away birds...: not only for ... obviously military drills or for harming chosen people...
But the foremost engagement of this whole work is never to choose; but if for us is mandatory either to avoid bare subjective description or - worse - to accept even if impressive FAKE misconception, also our directive is never to be surprised and denying every circumstance. Damaging and even serious harming actions can be performed with engines which can be produced as very real and even commercial tools, which can be bought even by everyone, even with banal order forms in Internet. These powerful and deceitful "energies" are surely NOT something as ghosts' tricks, or science fiction Star Wars Engines: they are realities which could be managed by everyone, also or mostly by not ever ethical persons, but it is deceitful to "cry wolf" without giving any "how", "when" and "where" - look on Fake-mysteries on biological targets.Personal cases offer first hand authenticated files: the Authors of these files/chapters share their data with a solid documentation. After the book published the Suda Case with its FIRST HAND collected exact DOCUMENTS - "corrected" since the previous version had a serious error in the title, completed by the original series of illustrated documents to be seen or downloaded; and supported by another renewed file presenting personal pictures and a sample of artist's portfolio: Artist Suda: Presentation. Besides on regard of this case Segnalazione di allarme: internazionali is improved by an article - quoted also in Links di organizzazioni e iniziative protettetive, and detailed in Artist/designer Andrzej Suda case - implying how children kidnapping and emigrants' misleading could be "political" NOT only "criminal" facts. Just referring to a real case of implanted abusive microchips it is possible to read a whole seriuos technical expertise on a pdf file and his experience explained by other data - mails etc. - in a new file LarsonReport.htm. Particularly the medical field (together with Civil Rights one) is very dangerously tangled and quarrelsome: look mainly at "historic" and "scientific" novelties - unfortunately often only in Italian since coming from Italian Organizations and/or Italian media - on Pagina scientifico-medica, on Malattie rare in offerta speciale noteworthy at lobotomia and at Metilfenidato e sindrome da deficit di attenzione e iperattività (on the two last files it is to be mostly noticed the specification - also in English - regarding the use of DSM-IV). But a totally renewed - step by step advancing very FIRST HAND - powerful documentation is rising and at once published on line on Esperimenti su bambine/i. This document regards a precise, in progress testimony of the splitting of multiple personalities: this pages are exactly what spontaneously wrote the person, thus its ITALIAN should not to be translated to preserve its genuineness. This testimony is so probatory to have to be held in many placements: on other files of the site - Segnalazione di allarme internazionali and on Testimonianze e dubbi and even on The guilt-free soldier very improved by this internal link - then also on another site/book regarding not “harmful facts” but a better consciousness till the children’s raising Today’s adults = children of YESTERDAY, Adults of today -> adults of TOMORROW). Any way the international scenery of the Segnalazione di allarme internazionali file can be improved time by time by ever more "international" advices coming from personal interviews, personal mails or verified information from media: even a crime-movie fiction (produced by Italian RAI Fiction) - The Chinese wife - tells a story to be meditated since very alike to real facts happened to real persons. Any way sometimes doesn't be despised something coming from apparently simple fiction: if It's Abuse NOT Science fiction what does tell the trailer of the fiction/movie The chinese wife? Is totally a crime-fiction the description of implanted microchips on immigrants' body? a story of a criminal tycoon "protected" instead of normally sued, of a criminal international tycoon so powerful to hinder investigators also on committing other crimes?Can perhaps this story allude to real facts growing up and develop on a enormously spread international scenery? individual concentration and attention; but - as told in this Italian writing:
Instead need to tell you that I was alarmed the other day when I received, from two sources, Brice/Sue's announcement about the new project Brice/Sue wants to do, by getting a bunch of mind-control survivors to send her information about their histories.Icke, by the way, allegedly has been putting information out claiming that mind-control survivors were actually abducted or whatever by human-sized lizard-ET's. This, if true, is of great concern to me because the lizard-men/et crap was used as a hypnotic screen memory with high-level MC survivors so they would not be able to see the faces of the people who really abducted and harmed them. You can't prosecute or expose what you can't see clearly enough to remember. Anyway, if he is writing and presenting such materials, then in my opinion, he ought to be run out of the US on a rail, tarred and feathered. If he's not presenting such materials, then the information given me was blatant disinformation, and I will think otherwise of him when I am convinced it is so.It is typical of the planning of the whole of our activity to signalize concrete facts, news and information in the most precise way, drawn from original sources and not derived from second-hand materials, constantly verified through intersected and contextualized validations and comparisons; in other words we must confirm that our firm intention is NOT to suggest hypotheses, NOT to expound our views but to construe our work as a source of information and linkable data. Therefore from the point of view of exposing and documenting we consider that the possibility of using means of communication others than mere verbal language cannot be renounced; as in talking we avail ourselves of inflexions, tones and gestures, so even in writing integrating diverse languages - the most obvious being the visual one - can make communication and documentation more incisive and less debatable: in fact data and information matched with illustrations to justify them, are less likely to be confused with for sheer opinions,mere hypothesis or chatter. Our task is continually in progress; then we strongly need to be continually better and widely informed from others' experiences: may we ask for review or at least for comments? Through our long, patient, personalized work we contacted some so-called mind control websites' owners, so-called mind-control''s and other harmful misdeeds' victims..., some persons so-called interested etc. etc. ... What we - unwilling - learnt? That there are a lot, an unbearable lot, of “chatters” very proud to CHAT on regard of Big Games, a lot of not believable silly and unaware people, unaware also that every “word” can be followed and used - if not covertly siggested - by the other field and so able to become a trail towards danger: in fact we discovered to have met also really not reliable ones. Wolves disguised as lambs, true willing betrayers... but any way a lot of unaware naive unconscious effective betrayers... Furthermore and above all we emphatically maintain that we do not allude to any “motive”, much less to a “guilty” party or hypothesise are the “harms”, or “damage”, or “anomalies”, unless dealing with accusations proved in court (see for example the file/chapter Mind Control Victim Awarded $1 Millions). We do NOT work on searching the “already known”, it is to say every time if possible we do NOT try to quote something published: on the contrary we search to have and display FIRST HAND documentation and/or direct data from original sources – it is to say: producers etc. - . So we are usually rather far from reporters and magazines. Our Association – scientific, professionally medical and if possible juridical - has instead a demanding and direct IN CHARGE many real persons really suffering and really in – sometimes – extreme danger: a very tiring and sickening task, a big part of our endeavor was to recognize, avoid or... quarrel against the above described hidden, disguised menaces.
Chicken or eggs? Which is the first problem?
Self restraint identified with Top PowerAt February 2005 - media published as a new this sentence: state government panel in Oregon has barred a psychiatrist from practicing medicine because he talked to his patients about the new world order, saying such discussions could cause "emotional duress".... The controversy began in 2002, when Wittkopp, in an interview with the board's investigative committee, defended his use of reality testing on patients. The report states that to help some patients, Wittkopp gave them information on the New World Order which he considers an international effort to establish world government and a world economic system and a world religion. As you noticed not only me but also Eleanor sent you the aforementioned article. Why? Because is about the subject that touches us personally. The whole issue reminds me CHICKEN OR EGG WAS FIRST problem. We (me and Eleanor) come from the opposite side than you. Both sides have ONE THING IN COMMON - we care, we see the problem and try to find a solution. You, as a professional, think about the patient first. Me, Eleanor and other victims (lay people) have a tendency to forget about the patient (very often a victim) and to concentrate on the source of evil (whatever it is in our beliefs).To get an almost direct answer to such way to think, one can use a real data as a critical exemple.
Thus not only should stop to describe every not enough precise and specified data: on the contrary it is mandatory to avoid every inference regarding not well supported occurrences, every boasting battles against too much "high" High Powers as against a wide "common sense", against unknowable, hidden enemies as against the unawareness of lay-people. Such a fight can put forward with some hope to succeed merely if pointing out and warning against them in a way the most precise, seriously studied, accurate defined: yet AVOIDING bare words or pitiful moaning one can fight on an acceptable level. To recognize the reality of "human external world", its connections, oppositions, changeable alliances is difficult even for inside trained people: how awful consequences could bring about to misunderstand facts with "opinions" and "feelings", and the "master way" to confuse "friends" with "enemies" and vice versa! How much fallacious is the forthcoming when deceptive naivety or obtuseness assure to be aware of who are the culprits and their plans to act! How is deceitful to "cry wolf" without giving any "how", "when" and "where"! Unfortunately we find ourselves at times reluctantly constrained not to ignore but to fight against empty objections and ... idle chatter of those who approach these pages believing them to be the fruit of mere “opinions”! How to warn – with trouble and also with apprehension – those who, faced with “abnormal situations” shoot haphazardly without preparation and with unprovable accusations. It is for this reason that we WILL publish only anomalies and memories which are truly clearly definable, and not any data and/or testimonial and/or shared story even if reliable in the long term. Any grouping exclusively focussed on fighting a “common enemy” is basically structured like a sect, meaning like a non-homogenous entity united exclusively to incorporate individuals and entities with very different situations united not through any sense of real cooperating community but by a blind hostility towards a homogenous enemy. United because they are against a common target: real or more or less hypothetical but however characterized to be beyond any effective opposition other than symbolic action.
So built persecutory supporting groups have not to be confused with those focused instead on a very real COOPERATION, as happens for example in many associations of people ill from a particular pathology: their combined efforts being focused to better study their diseases and therefore better help doctors themselves. Of “vital” importance?
Naivety falling into superstitious gullibility and so open to foster “sect-like” organizations? Or even "derelict" persons ready to be involved in "Cult-like" groups?
Sects or similar “cliques” offer support and consolation to frail people in search of a pseudo “happiness”, to sick people who aspires to the indifference of a confined “serenity”: not for nothing Delgado himself wrote a book entitled La Felicidad, rather than only express his ferocious principles in his research into a Psychocivilized Society. Or else they welcome and “console” the more desperate victims mourning over their fate. Real mishaps or real and documented suffering are so collectively and indiscriminately given at general attention: not as proper afflictions but as ACCUSATIONS against the hypothetical common perpetrators. From this step where can we arrive: see The first humanitarian war in history: Hitler and the Sudetenlanders.
Hitler and Sudetenlanders? A postponed terrible World War?
One more year as gift to advantage Nazism?
Definitely any subject alluding to conspiracy, international plots, secret history and underground politics allures a morbid fascination for a lot of naive or aggressive or blatant people. Merely on searching books or videos checking these words an hotchpotch of assorted titles floods: even a lot of titles - near hundred! - not only racist but considering Hitler himself in various strange connection with Anglo-American powers.) For choosing a widespread subject too much considered "puzzling" and "wicked" it is to be noticed and just evidenced here, that two data alluding to Bilderberg Group and to lobotomy and Nobel price can give the opportunity to explain the methodological basics of our way to work supported by other more incisive explanations and questions recently published. Regarding the hypothetical New world order and weaponry, from other sites and lists notice two different cases to improve internal links on Segnalazione di allarme internazionali: Italia and pubblicazioni which endorses also a NEW mighty message with many links (for asks and doubts go to the linked source). Data and disclaimers regarding weaponry are also recently posted on Links e citazioni su segnali di pericolo: armi and lesivi, besides the new apport on libera vendita.
Of “vital” importance? Why “sect-like” or even "Cult-like"?
THE CLASH OF CIVILIZATIONS AND THE REMAKING OF WORLD ORDER
The Clash of Civilizations?: The Debateby Samuel P. Huntington
Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order
by Robert Kagan
IT IS TIME to stop pretending that Europeans and Americans share a common view of the world, or even that they occupy the same world
An hypothetic New World Order?
On September 1990 George H.W.Bush called for a New World Order... Pertaining to whom?
The summary The snake's head on Beppe Grillo's Blog looks to a part of the portrait of this enormous power.
Shadow Government? Self-restraint identified with top power?
(TheWorld Economic Forum (WEF) is a Geneva-based foundation whose annual meeting of top business leaders, national political leaders (presidents, prime ministers and others), and selected intellectuals and journalists is usually held in Davos, Switzerland. There are also regional meetings throughout the year. It was founded in 1971 by Klaus M. Schwab, a business professor in Switzerland.) On a mail at June 24 2006 we received a message regarding this matter, endorsing some links sending to actual newspapers articles - even to the front-page of The Globe and Mail where on can litterally read: Secretive power brokers' meeting coming to Ottawa? A group of very powerful individuals whose objective is to create one world government, based on an economic model from the Middle Ages, he said. This would be a post-industrial model where you have slaves and slave owners.May 24, 2006, The Globe and Mail (leading newspaper of Canada's capital city). [Snippets from the original article]: The Bilderberg Group, a secretive organization of politicians and business leaders from around the world, gave no public statements.... What they talked about at the Brookstreet Hotel is still a secret. The group meets annually, and is usually rumoured to discuss international politics and business, from Middle East crises to oil prices. The meetings always draw intensely curious outsiders who believe the Bilderbergers need to be exposed. One of these is Daniel Estulin, a Canadian who moved to Spain about 15 years ago -- because, he says, the Central Intelligence Agency tried to kill him. He feels safer in Spain. I'm much further out of the reach of the secret service -- both Canadian and American. I write the stories everyone else is afraid to write, he said. He and others staked out positions on the sidewalk where they could get a clear view of the hotel's front door. For hours, they watched through binoculars and telephoto lenses, waiting as men and women got into limos. Cameras clicked, and the Bilderberg-watchers scrolled through digital images afterwards, trying to identify which member of the group they had just recorded. Alex Jones, a documentary filmmaker from Texas, showed up with two of his crew. Man, this is just evil, he muttered as he paced up and down, watching more limos drive past. He was detained on his arrival in Canada, but says he was released after other media asked questions about him. It's a group of very powerful individuals whose objective is to create one world government, based on an economic model from the Middle Ages, he said. This would be a post-industrial model where you have slaves and slave owners.It's a group of very powerful individuals whose objective is to create one world government, based on an economic model from the Middle Ages, he said. This would be a post-industrial model where you have slaves and slave owners. An ask to Jon Ronson who has written about Bilderberg what it really is: They're a bunch of powerful people. They meet in secret. I do think that, by and large, many members of the Bilderberg Group actually see themselves in much the same way as the conspiracy theorists see them, as this shadowy cabal out... to influence world events. Bilderberg is into... a new world order. They see themselves as head hunters. They'll get an up-and-coming politician who they think may be president or prime minister one day. As globalist industrialist leaders who believe that politics shouldn't be in the hand of the politicians, they try and influence them with wise words. Bildergerg's secrecy, I think, harks back specifically to Henry Kissinger who... loves the idea of being this shadowy, secret figure.Any way the Bilderbergers' list don't complete the directory of the world's Very Important Persons. Rumors - for the time being: only rumors - tell that there are, someone says ten someone forty, active High Powers Groups sometimes enemies together sometimes allied, but notwithstanding ever potential source and efficient cause of dangers. Isn't a basic duty to try to better know each group and its members or participants and mostly their condition on settled or volatile wealth instead to fix the attention on only an unique one? Surely doing such a careful examination will get some unexpected surprises, or rather not only unexpected than puzzling ones. In the void created by such aloofness, an extraordinary conspiracy theory has grown up around the group that alleges the fate of the world is largely decided by Bilderberg. Davos: Wealth, power and a sprinkling of stardust.
The World Economic Forum at a small town in Switzerland tomorrow (Tuesday, 22 January 2008). Who will be there, and what's at stake?. For a few days an obscene proportion of the world's wealth and clout will be concentrated in one normally obscure Alpine town. Some 27 heads of state or government; 113 cabinet ministers; hundreds of chief executives, bankers, sovereign wealth fund managers, economists and the media: about 2,500 participants in all. This concentrated, eclectic mix of the top slice of humanity is part of the "magic" of this mountain redoubt....it is no wonder the place will be surrounded by barbed wire and intense security. If you've ever wanted to know what the Swiss army is for (apart from inventing handy little multi-tools), an attempt to penetrate the perimeter of Davos will tell you, as 5,000 troops do their bit to protect international capitalism from its enemies. The WEF gets under way this week, and the formal title of the week's proceedings, as ever, gives little away about the true agenda. The Power of Collaborative Innovation, while suggestive of the business elite's obsessions with the pace of technological change,... The prominent role allotted to Mr Wang, while not entirely novel, is nonetheless significant. This year at Davos there will be fewer figures from Hollywood, and rather more representing the new forces in the global economy – the new transnationals based in China, India, other rapidly growing emerging economies and the sovereign wealth funds that those nations and the petro-states of the Gulf now command.
The prospects for the BRICs (Brazil, Russia, India, China and their smaller satellite economies) have been one of the staples of international gatherings for years, but now the ruminations have a little more point to them. In 2008, for the first time, China will contribute more to the growth of the world economy than the United States. Double-digit growth in China should still just be possible this year, and it alone seems to stand between the world and a full-blown recession.... This is as it should be. The event has been growing in importance and prominence since its pioneering days in the early 1970s. In 1971 a German-born Swiss economist named Klaus Schwab hits upon the idea of an eclectic, informal, low-key, almost secretive gathering of the world's most influential figures and founded a not-for-profit foundation to achieve his ends.In those days it had much in common with the Bilderberg group, but today the WEF has left its modest beginnings way behind and actively seeks out the attention of the world, whether it is to launch a campaign against World Poverty (as Gordon Brown and Bono did in 2005) or to balance the needs and aspirations of the old economies of the West, the emerging economies of the east and the still poor billions in the south. ...
By Sean O'Grady
According to the Independent in 1997: Formed in the Fifties... One of the most influential, secretive, and, it goes without saying, exclusive political clubs in the West... One member contacted by this newspaper said he could not talk about it 'even off, off the record'. Another simply put the phone down... The source of its funding is a mystery... One of the earliest discussions of the Circle was in Lobster magazine in 1986: The Pinay Circle was set up in 1969 around the former Prime Minister of France, Antoine Pinay. Pinay was very old and seems to have been little more than a figurehead. Its chief fundraiser and leading light is the former lawyer, Jean Violet. A senior figure in the French equivalent of the CBI, Violet has also been a member of SDECE, the French equivalent of the CIA and MI6. (Faligot, 1985 p 194). According to reports from West German intelligence (in Intelligence/Parapolitics (Paris) December 1984) Violet had links with South African, American, British, Swiss and West German intelligence. The West German BND is said to be one of his sources of finance. With these contacts Violet had put together an informal group of conservative, anti-communist politicians, bankers, journalists etc - 'The Pinay Circle'. It is said to meet twice a year discussing how to promote the conservative cause. The following are said to have been, or still are, members of the circle: Julian Amery MP, Brian Crozier, Nicholas Elliot (B) (ex MI6), William Colby (ex DCIA), Edwin Feulner of The Heritage Foundation, and General D. Stilwell (DIA). Pinay projects are said to have included the promotion of Mrs Thatcher in the UK and Strauss in West Germany. ISC records from as early as 1972 mention efforts by the Pinay Circle to generate moral and financial support for ISC: Crozier was apparently hoping for £20,000 from the Circle in 1973 - a large contribution by ISC's standards. The Circle paid for an ISC study "European Security and the Soviet Problem". Further correspondence from 1975 shows the Circle active in organising meetings in "Madrid, Rome, Milan, Brussels and Bonn .... with the object of raising money for the Institute (ie ISC) and enhancing its reputation." (Time Out 27 June 1975) In 2004 the Sunday Times reported: Nadhmi Auchi is a member of an elite club known as Le Cercle. It consists of transatlantic businessmen and politicians and is often compared with the Bilderberg Group. The secretive group of 100 people meets twice a year to discuss global politics and business. The next meeting is scheduled to be held in Washington this month. The club, which has close links to the intelligence services, was founded in the 1950s by former French prime minister Antoine Pinay and former German chancellor Konrad Adenauer. Guests at the club's meetings have included Richard Nixon, Henry Kissinger, the Sultan of Oman, Romania's Ion Illiescu and King Hussein of Jordan. The current chairman is Lord Lamont, the former Tory chancellor, and other members are thought to include Anthony Cavendish and Geoffrey Tantum, who are both former MI6 officers.of a co-ordinated international destabilisation programme gave their heart-felt thanks. Among them were Britain's Iron Lady, Margaret Thatcher - Madonna of the Armaments industry - and America's less brittle, and considerably less acute, Ronald Reagan - humble originator of the mega-tax-buck-swallowing SDI "Star Wars" programme and also, thus, a valued friend of the boys at Guns R Us International. These two decades saw a proliferation of right-wing, quasi official and secretive groups that co-ordinated intelligence, propaganda and undertook covert black-operations around the globe. One of the most shadowy of all is the "Pinay Cercle", named after its founder Antoine Pinay, Premier of France in 1951. Known more simply as "Le Cercle" it is recognised as a more clandestine sinister organisation to the already very secretive Bilderberg Group - a "Perhaps more sinister, and certainly more shadowy than the Bilderbergers, the "Pinay Cercle" is an "Atlanticist" right-wing organisation of serving and retired intelligence operatives, military officers and politicians that conspired to "affect" changes in government. Amongst other things they claim credit for engineering the election of Margaret Thatcher in the U.K. and may have been behind the ousting of Australia's Gough Whitlam. Now almost forgotten, the decade of the "Seventies" was a time of immense political upheaval, dirty tricks and incessant rumours of right-wing military Coup d'Etats in leading western democracies. Amongst the long list of resulting casualties of this "decade of tension" were Britain's Prime Ministers: Harold Wilson and Ted Heath, Australia's Gough Whitlam, Sweden's Olaf Palme, America's Jimmy Carter and France's Francois Mitterand. The more southern flanks of Nato's European axis: Portugal, Spain, Turkey and Greece converted rumour into chilling fact via the steel-blue glaze of gun-barrels. Italy, home of Pizza, the Pope, and Propaganda Due (P2) came in for its own brand of political fixit, courtesy of Uncle Sam's very own CIA. As the decade of the "eighties" slowly slipped above the now less than pink eastern horizon, right-wing beneficiaries behind-the-scenes invisible influence" network.Both groups share a familiar membership which includes Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski and David Rockefeller. Each of these three luminaries of the international power network are, in addition to the foregoing, influential members of The Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations as well as being regular attendees at Britain's "Chatham House" - The Royal Institute of International Studies - shadowy twin to America's CFR.
Antoine Pinay was extremely influential in Europe and the United States, where he had forged links with President Nixon. Pinay attended the Bilderberg inaugural meeting in Oosterbeek, Holland during May 1952. By 1969, Pinay together with Jean Violet, a Lawyer working for the French Intelligence Service SDECE, and Archduke Otto von Habsburg, heir to the Austrian throne, formed Le Cercle, and secretly began recruiting men of influence as members.
The intention was to shift the political climate of Europe to the far right via a secretly financed campaign of propaganda, and to establish a private intelligence service that would work, unofficially, with the existing security apparatus of the west. Author Stephen Dorrill also believes there are serpentine inter-connections between Le Cercle and the Gladio network, a "stay-behind anti communist" military guerrilla force set up by Nato's Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE) during the "fifties", that was largely composed of ex Nazis'.
It was brought to our attention that the Corriere Della Sera, one of the most leading Italian newspapers published a violent attack on lobotomy (Corriere: 'Not only different awareness'). A similar report published on the Corriere is in itself most telling, but the indirect and underlying connection is far more stimulating.
In all, lobotomies were used on 40,000 to 50,000 Americans between 1936 and the late 1950s. Freeman
For Italy: look on the book Mario Tobino IL Manicomio di Pechino pp.29-35
Moniz Lobotomy Stamp: This is an actual Portuguese stamp posted by Christine at Monday, August 01, 2005). In 1936, the Portuguese neurologist Egas Moniz introduced a surgical operation, prefrontal leukotomy, which after an initial period came to be used particularly in the treatment of schizophrenia. The operation, later called lobotomy, consisted in incisions that destroyed connections between the prefrontal region and other parts of the brain...
The treatment became rather popular in many countries all over the world and Moniz received the Nobel Prize in 1949 Antonio Caetano de Abreu Freire Egas Moniz born in Avanca, Portugal, on November 29, 1874, the son of Fernando de Pina Rezende Abreu and Maria do Rosario de Almeida e Sousa. He received his early education from his uncle Abbé Caetano de Pina Rezende Abreu Sa Freire, before joining the Faculty of Medicine at Coimbra University. He received further education at Bordeaux and Paris and became Professor at Coimbra in 1902. In 1911 he transferred to the new Chair in Neurology at Lisbon where he remained until his death. He also worked for a time as a physician in the Hospital of Santa Maria, Lisbon. Moniz entered politics in 1903 and served as a Deputy in the Portugese Parliament until 1917 when he became Portuguese Ambassador to Spain. Later in 1917 he was appointed Minister for Foreign Affairs and he was President of the Portuguese Delegation at the Paris Peace Conference in 1918.
Another comparable fact called our attention: Minister of Foreign Affairs and deeply implied in International Organizations and happenings was also the Italian doctor Gaetano Martino, University teacher in Human Physiology and Rector of Messina University, also and mostly Author with Moruzzi of a “classic” set book for future doctors: a text book for Medicine students dealing almost only with cat’s brain vivisection: in which the main subject was .... how to experiment on living cats' encephalons.
But if this is the antecedent to start from, it is fundamental to consider what can indirectly derive from it, in view of further considerations and research of a more general purport, pertaining not only to a bad use of medicine. Starting from these premises quite by chance we came across these two bizarre indications that - put together - can be somehow very perplexing. The work of the Association consists particularly in collecting pieces of information – if possible first hand, even in minute fragments - and then intersecting them, till little by little to find so close-knit a texture to bring to the surface truths apparently hidden or even apparently non-existing.The Corriere is an independent surely not a "left-wing" newspaper: so in itself this article is by itself a very information, but the underlying indirect connection is far more stimulating.Were and have been for a long time and in different historical contexts Ministers of Foreign Affairs in their own countries not politicians or diplomats on the contrary particularly sadistic doctors, not only general practitioners but also University professors: therefore “trainers” of future doctors, University Directors and eventually Authors of text-boks, scientists interested on researches pertaining to enhancing warriors' performances (to built so-called warriors without sleep?) and moreover to block will and consciousness on "not agreed people". Such were the Portuguese Moniz, the inventor of lobotomy (who was awarded the Nobel prize for it) and the Italian Gaetano Martino (professor of human physiology and Rector of the University of Messina, author of an authoritative text-book for Medicine students).
style="font-weight: normal;"> Can one assume that, through some sort of easy making mechanism, a destructive planning out - analogous to that devised by Delgado, - not to mention Hitler - could have some relation with… Foreign policy? Is irrelevant the fact that Gaetano Martino’s son – Antonio – was previously Minister of Foreign Affairs and then Ministry of Defence for a whole period of Government? As working hypothesis: could not a certain kind of sadism in action offer a privileged way to these Ministries? Looking for evidence in such direction, following these tracks could not one discover coverage given and favours done to Mengele. believed lobotomies worked because the procedure severed connections between the frontal lobes of the brain and the thalamus, thought to be the seat of human emotion, which the mentally ill apparently had in overabundance. Although his theories have been discredited, Freeman was one of the few psychiatrists of his era who believed that mental illness had a physical biological component.
Oaxes and rumors or true facts? Kidnapped normal children to construct artificial devilish "monsters"? "Multiple Personality Disorder"?
It is easy to speak in a conjectural way on regard of "Multiple Personality Disorder". but here are depicted in total spontaneity two "personalities" - Monk and Letitia - the two "multiples" trained to become killers and spies after being built during structured abuses.
The "protagonist" of these terrible mishaps expressed this picture during a very poignant, painful flash-back, together with some very explanatory writings. The most of the texts are in Italian but a shortened translation in English can be reached on Esperimenti su bambine/i at the sub chapter: translation.
Tyrants don't devour you: they devour your FEAR....
(illustrator Joseph P. Orwell
a page from the book
lI libro dei senza paura -
The book for fearless people: a hand book to teach children for fight their fears -
Printing House Dami
"Fear" believes to keep safe on building barricades: and then narrows spaces, knowledge, relationship and understanding... and widens on return new fearfulness and dependency
Sleeping reason breeds monsters and monsters? Then it is compelling to WATCH, to WATCH. to WATCH. Ever should be rejected not documented mere asserptions together with not probed even oneself's own feelings. DOUBTS must be ever the foremost GUIDES for sustaining to MIND and WIDE RANGE AWARENESS.
To consider a better understanding of the whole professional and cultural endeavor and not only of the site and books go to Home page, completed by Presentazione dello Statuto e dei Principi dell'Associazione, or also in English with the large, renewed file Presentazione e indice ragionato: come cominciare / Preamble: how to begin. The Parte terza: violazioni medicalizzate / medical violence - with the preparatory and miscellaneous chapter Pagina scientifico-medica - holds a widespread and continually renewed input on regard of deliberate medical malpractice.
Presentazione dello Statuto e dei principi dell'Associazione
Links e citazioni su segnali di pericolo
Segnalazioni di Allarme: Internazionali
Links Europei contro la Pedofilia, il Settarismo e gli Abusi Strutturati e/o Rituali
Ringraziamenti / Aknowledgement and thanks
ESPERIMENTI SU BAMBINE/I
e related pdf
to be completed with Il Prezzo del Potere, only with a short English excerpt
Objects are surely better "sincere witnesses" NUOVISSIME TECNOLOGIE? Advanced Technologies? Technologies Avancées? Spitzentechnologien?
to be completed and assessed by Pseudo-misteri e coinvolgimenti biologici / Fake-mysteries on biological targets
The Guilt-free Soldier
Artist/Designer Andrzej Suda's case, (Andrew) Suda: Presentation / Presentazione come artista
Andrzej (Andrew) Suda's DOCUMENTATION / DOCUMENTAZIONE
Suda correct pdf with its original pictures (*)
TOTEM and TABOO: awful and fertile rise of new superstition
Delgado & Skinner
Psychocivilization and its discontents
Another Web site and its related books expound explicit or only alluding considerations explaining our point of view and their roots: go to Consciousness and memory, My guides... my roots; besides the English index which endorses our basics as a real statement of meaning.
Arguments almost alike the ones held on this site can be read on the other site one already published on its related book
Opinion, fact, complaint
For deeper and scientific information
Anamnesis? A way for healing...
and again on: Consciousness and memory
a parallel, even little different, page:TOTEM and TABOO: awful and fertile rise of new superstition
Sorry: only in Italian:
IMBROGLIO E' IL CONTRARIO DI SVILUPPO. Dalla 'violenza contro il bambino' a 'tempo di mutamenti' e a 'la meglio gioventù
Quando la cartella clinica è terapeutica
Complex Trauma and Disorders of Extreme Stress (DESNOS)
Armi ad Energia diretta
Caso Suda: file originale
Note: every file can be either duplicated or reproduced on electronic supports, paper or any other form and can be freely circulated under two conditions:
1) Whatever the support employed, the books must be reproduced INTEGRAL and COMPLETE both in their text and in their graphics; every change, omission or integration of any sort cause the loss of permission to duplicate and automatically turn into legal OFFENCES provided for by the law in protection of copyright.
2) Any circulation of the duplicates, whatever the support, must be FREE OF CHARGE.
From another site or better from a derived book come some data regarding MEDICINE and CONSCIOUSNESS basics: people can download pdf files and also COMPLETE books - sorry - only in Italian but only under usual condition of Copyright.pdf files/chapters
Quando la cartella clinica è terapeutica.Dare ai ricordi una seconda vita? Consapevolezza e memoria
ESPERIMENTI SU BAMBINE_I.PDF
Medicina: scienza applicata e multidisciplinare: Emozioni, istinti, ricordi, contraddizioni
pdf of complete books
Infanzia:un-mestiere-difficilissimo Copertina libro Infanzia
Consapevolezza e Memoria
It's Abuse NOT Science Fiction?
Up-to-date Dossiers of Gli Abusi mentali, fisici e tecnologici NON sono Fantascienza / It's Abuse NOT Science fiction
Mental, physical and technological abuses: NOT science fiction.
To rearrange, make known and divulge all the collected material – especially unpublished - in November 2002 the Italian Association, Scientific and Juridical, Against Mental, Physical and Technological Abuses – acronym aisjca-mft – was founded and its mouthpiece Web site was put on the Net; then, in July 2005, the whole Web site – how it looked like at that time – became also an ENCYCLOPEDIC book. But, because of its own statutory nature a Web site – contrary to a printed book – can’t be a “finished” work: in fact it DOES NOT aim at providing purely historical documentation, but at collecting a CONTINUATIVE adjournment about facts and testimonies. Thanks to this dynamism requests and debates concretize into other “facts” and these debates do not remain theoric discussions. And so, in this years, in conformity with these presuppositions, some files have been greatly modified and others completely created: with new information about facts and authentic texts of testimonies which are still being collected. Then came the impellent necessity to publish in preview this new data as a SUPPLEMENT of the main book, before starting its real second edition not only revised but also even better adjourned.
Book cover: International Copyright © January 4 2005 (Certificate 143935559)
Web pages Copyright: International Copyright © May 6 2006 (Certificate 149917786)
Book copyright: International Copyright © August 5 2005 Associazione italiana, scientifica e giuridica contro gli abusi mentali, fisici e tecnologici - All rights reserved (Certificate 149917786)